OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to apply a computational method commonly used in data mining discipline, classification trees (CTs), to evaluate the growth features in untreated Class III subjects. MATERIALS AND METHODS: CT was applied to data from 91 untreated Class III subjects (48 females and 43 males) and compared with the results of discriminant analysis (DA). For all subjects, lateral cephalograms were available at T1 (mean age 10.4 ± 2.0 years) and at T2 (mean age 15.4 ± 1.9 years). A cephalometric analysis comprising 11 variables was performed. The subjects were divided into two subgroups, unfavourable ('Bad') and favourable ('Good') growers, according to the quality of the skeletal growth rate in comparison with the normal craniofacial growth. RESULTS: CTs showed that the most informative attribute for the prediction of favourable/unfavourable skeletal growth was the SNA angle. Subjects with SNA values lower than 79.1 degrees showed a risk of 94 per cent of growing unfavourably. DA was able to select palatal plane to mandibular plane angle as predictors. DA, however, showed a statistically significant higher rate of misclassification when compared with CTs (40.7 per cent versus 12.1 per cent, binomial exact test: odds ratio = 6.20; P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: CTs provided a valid measure of elucidating the effective contribution of craniofacial characteristics in predicting favourable/unfavourable growth in untreated Class III subjects.

Understanding interactions among cephalometric variables during growth in untreated Class III subjects / Auconi, Pietro; Scazzocchio, Marco; Caldarelli, Guido; Nieri, Michele; Mcnamara, James A; Franchi, Lorenzo. - In: EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS. - ISSN 0141-5387. - STAMPA. - 39:(2017), pp. 395-401. [10.1093/ejo/cjw084]

Understanding interactions among cephalometric variables during growth in untreated Class III subjects

NIERI, MICHELE
Methodology
;
FRANCHI, LORENZO
Conceptualization
2017

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to apply a computational method commonly used in data mining discipline, classification trees (CTs), to evaluate the growth features in untreated Class III subjects. MATERIALS AND METHODS: CT was applied to data from 91 untreated Class III subjects (48 females and 43 males) and compared with the results of discriminant analysis (DA). For all subjects, lateral cephalograms were available at T1 (mean age 10.4 ± 2.0 years) and at T2 (mean age 15.4 ± 1.9 years). A cephalometric analysis comprising 11 variables was performed. The subjects were divided into two subgroups, unfavourable ('Bad') and favourable ('Good') growers, according to the quality of the skeletal growth rate in comparison with the normal craniofacial growth. RESULTS: CTs showed that the most informative attribute for the prediction of favourable/unfavourable skeletal growth was the SNA angle. Subjects with SNA values lower than 79.1 degrees showed a risk of 94 per cent of growing unfavourably. DA was able to select palatal plane to mandibular plane angle as predictors. DA, however, showed a statistically significant higher rate of misclassification when compared with CTs (40.7 per cent versus 12.1 per cent, binomial exact test: odds ratio = 6.20; P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: CTs provided a valid measure of elucidating the effective contribution of craniofacial characteristics in predicting favourable/unfavourable growth in untreated Class III subjects.
2017
39
395
401
Goal 3: Good health and well-being for people
Auconi, Pietro; Scazzocchio, Marco; Caldarelli, Guido; Nieri, Michele; Mcnamara, James A; Franchi, Lorenzo
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
cjw084.pdf

Accesso chiuso

Tipologia: Pdf editoriale (Version of record)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati
Dimensione 184.26 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
184.26 kB Adobe PDF   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in FLORE sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificatore per citare o creare un link a questa risorsa: https://hdl.handle.net/2158/1087765
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 13
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 12
social impact