Abstract BACKGROUND: There is no obvious link between qualitative descriptors and overall intensity of dyspnea during bronchoconstriction in patients with asthma. Aims: To determine whether qualitative and quantitative perception of methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction independently contribute to characterizing clinically stable asthma. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We assessed changes in inspiratory capacity, and quantitative (by Borg scale) and qualitative (by a panel of eight dyspnea descriptors) sensations of dyspnea at 20 to 30% fall in FEV(1) during methacholine inhalation in 49 asthmatics. Furthermore, we calculated the level of perception of bronchoconstriction at 20% fall in FEV(1) (PB(20)). RESULTS: Descriptors selected by patients during methacholine inhalation allowed us to define three language subgroups: (1) chest tightness (subgroup A, n = 21); (2) work/effort (subgroup B, n = 7); and (3) both descriptors (subgroup C, n = 13). Eight of the 49 patients (subgroup D) were not able to make a clear-cut distinction among descriptors. The subgroups exhibited similar function at baseline and during methacholine inhalation. Most importantly, patients selected chest tightness to a greater extent (42.85%), and work/effort (14.3%) and both descriptors (26.5%) to a lesser extent at the lowest level of bronchoconstriction (FEV(1) fall < 10%) as at 20% fall in FEV(1). Thirty-two patients were normoperceivers (PB(20) > or = 1.4 to < 5 arbitrary units [au]), 7 patients were hyperperceivers (PB(20) > or = 5 au), and 10 patients were hypoperceivers (PB(20) < 1.4 au). Language subgroups were equally distributed across the perceiver subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with clinically stable asthma, PB(20) and language of dyspnea independently contribute to defining the condition of the disease. However, the possibility that this independence may be due to a beta-error should be taken into account.
Is there a link between the qualitative descriptors and the quantitative perception of dyspnea in asthma? / C. COLI; M.PICARIELLO; L.STENDARDI; M.GRAZZINI; B.BINAZZI; R. DURANTI; G. SCANO. - In: CHEST. - ISSN 0012-3692. - STAMPA. - 130:(2006), pp. 436-441.
Is there a link between the qualitative descriptors and the quantitative perception of dyspnea in asthma?
DURANTI, ROBERTO;SCANO, GIORGIO LUIGI
2006
Abstract
Abstract BACKGROUND: There is no obvious link between qualitative descriptors and overall intensity of dyspnea during bronchoconstriction in patients with asthma. Aims: To determine whether qualitative and quantitative perception of methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction independently contribute to characterizing clinically stable asthma. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We assessed changes in inspiratory capacity, and quantitative (by Borg scale) and qualitative (by a panel of eight dyspnea descriptors) sensations of dyspnea at 20 to 30% fall in FEV(1) during methacholine inhalation in 49 asthmatics. Furthermore, we calculated the level of perception of bronchoconstriction at 20% fall in FEV(1) (PB(20)). RESULTS: Descriptors selected by patients during methacholine inhalation allowed us to define three language subgroups: (1) chest tightness (subgroup A, n = 21); (2) work/effort (subgroup B, n = 7); and (3) both descriptors (subgroup C, n = 13). Eight of the 49 patients (subgroup D) were not able to make a clear-cut distinction among descriptors. The subgroups exhibited similar function at baseline and during methacholine inhalation. Most importantly, patients selected chest tightness to a greater extent (42.85%), and work/effort (14.3%) and both descriptors (26.5%) to a lesser extent at the lowest level of bronchoconstriction (FEV(1) fall < 10%) as at 20% fall in FEV(1). Thirty-two patients were normoperceivers (PB(20) > or = 1.4 to < 5 arbitrary units [au]), 7 patients were hyperperceivers (PB(20) > or = 5 au), and 10 patients were hypoperceivers (PB(20) < 1.4 au). Language subgroups were equally distributed across the perceiver subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with clinically stable asthma, PB(20) and language of dyspnea independently contribute to defining the condition of the disease. However, the possibility that this independence may be due to a beta-error should be taken into account.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Coli et al Chest 2006.pdf
Accesso chiuso
Tipologia:
Versione finale referata (Postprint, Accepted manuscript)
Licenza:
Tutti i diritti riservati
Dimensione
384.1 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
384.1 kB | Adobe PDF | Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in FLORE sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.