In this paper, discrepancies and reference inaccuracies in the paper (Grana et al., 2003) are pointed out. Specifically, it is demonstrated that the definitions of “lesion gradient” and “skin lesion gradient,” widely used in a number of medical papers on computer analysis of pigmented skin lesions, are unambiguous, and that the “new algorithm for border description” described in the subject paper substantially relies on well-established concepts dating back over one decade ago.
Comments on “A New Algorithm for Border Description of Polarized Light Surface Microscopic Images of Pigmented Skin Lesions” / M. Burroni; L. Alparone; F. Argenti. - In: IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING. - ISSN 0278-0062. - STAMPA. - 25:(2006), pp. 1655-1656. [10.1109/TMI.2006.884205]
Comments on “A New Algorithm for Border Description of Polarized Light Surface Microscopic Images of Pigmented Skin Lesions”
ALPARONE, LUCIANO;ARGENTI, FABRIZIO
2006
Abstract
In this paper, discrepancies and reference inaccuracies in the paper (Grana et al., 2003) are pointed out. Specifically, it is demonstrated that the definitions of “lesion gradient” and “skin lesion gradient,” widely used in a number of medical papers on computer analysis of pigmented skin lesions, are unambiguous, and that the “new algorithm for border description” described in the subject paper substantially relies on well-established concepts dating back over one decade ago.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
TMI_dec06.pdf
Accesso chiuso
Tipologia:
Pdf editoriale (Version of record)
Licenza:
Tutti i diritti riservati
Dimensione
1.06 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.06 MB | Adobe PDF | Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in FLORE sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.