When considering the question of the ontology of art, two approaches prevail to¬day: an essentialist approach, which aspires to define the invariant properties of eve¬ry artwork, and a functionalist approach, according to which an artwork's properties are contingent and dependent on symbolic practices. The static, intensionalist, and descriptivist ontology of the former approach is well exemplified by A. Danto; the dy¬namic, extentionalist, and constructivist ontology of the latter approach, by N. Goodman. After a criticism mainly centered on Danto's view, the author suggests a definition of work of art able to exceed the opposition between the two models.
Ontologie statiche e dinamiche. Danto vs. Goodman (e oltre) / F. Desideri. - In: PARADIGMI. - ISSN 1120-3404. - STAMPA. - 2:(2010), pp. 25-42. [10.3280/PARA2010-002003]
Ontologie statiche e dinamiche. Danto vs. Goodman (e oltre)
DESIDERI, FABRIZIO
2010
Abstract
When considering the question of the ontology of art, two approaches prevail to¬day: an essentialist approach, which aspires to define the invariant properties of eve¬ry artwork, and a functionalist approach, according to which an artwork's properties are contingent and dependent on symbolic practices. The static, intensionalist, and descriptivist ontology of the former approach is well exemplified by A. Danto; the dy¬namic, extentionalist, and constructivist ontology of the latter approach, by N. Goodman. After a criticism mainly centered on Danto's view, the author suggests a definition of work of art able to exceed the opposition between the two models.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
F. Desideri_ontologie_statiche_e_dinamiche.pdf
Accesso chiuso
Tipologia:
Versione finale referata (Postprint, Accepted manuscript)
Licenza:
Tutti i diritti riservati
Dimensione
168.14 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
168.14 kB | Adobe PDF | Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in FLORE sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.