This paper aims to evaluate a teaching methodology for the learning of scientific concepts in a primary school context. The focus is on the role played by individual writing, associated to a collective observation of an experiment and a classroom discussion. The hypothesis is that this methodology shows its effect both, on the scientific quality of written descriptions of experiments and on children's metacognitive thinking. The participants were 172 primary school students, attending grade III, IV, and V. For each grade, two groups were formed and both observed an experiment. The experimental group's students wrote individually what was observed in the experiment, discussed it in the classroom, and wrote again individually a report on what was observed and discussed. The control group's students discussed what was observed in the experiment and wrote individually a report on what was observed and discussed. Different experiments have been carried out depending on the grade (combustion, evaporation, and conservation of liquids). The results substantially confirmed a better effectiveness for the pattern “observation-individual writing-discussion-individual writing”. Moreover, the experimental groups' students showed a more metacognitive thinking than the control groups' ones did.

The role of individual writing in fostering scientific conceptualization / Bigozzi L.; Vezzani C.; Tarchi C.; Fiorentini C.. - In: EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY OF EDUCATION. - ISSN 0256-2928. - ELETTRONICO. - 26:(2011), pp. 45-59. [10.1007/s10212-010-0031-8]

The role of individual writing in fostering scientific conceptualization

BIGOZZI, LUCIA;TARCHI, CHRISTIAN;
2011

Abstract

This paper aims to evaluate a teaching methodology for the learning of scientific concepts in a primary school context. The focus is on the role played by individual writing, associated to a collective observation of an experiment and a classroom discussion. The hypothesis is that this methodology shows its effect both, on the scientific quality of written descriptions of experiments and on children's metacognitive thinking. The participants were 172 primary school students, attending grade III, IV, and V. For each grade, two groups were formed and both observed an experiment. The experimental group's students wrote individually what was observed in the experiment, discussed it in the classroom, and wrote again individually a report on what was observed and discussed. The control group's students discussed what was observed in the experiment and wrote individually a report on what was observed and discussed. Different experiments have been carried out depending on the grade (combustion, evaporation, and conservation of liquids). The results substantially confirmed a better effectiveness for the pattern “observation-individual writing-discussion-individual writing”. Moreover, the experimental groups' students showed a more metacognitive thinking than the control groups' ones did.
2011
26
45
59
Bigozzi L.; Vezzani C.; Tarchi C.; Fiorentini C.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
bigozzi 2011t.pdf

Accesso chiuso

Tipologia: Versione finale referata (Postprint, Accepted manuscript)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati
Dimensione 201.87 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
201.87 kB Adobe PDF   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in FLORE sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificatore per citare o creare un link a questa risorsa: https://hdl.handle.net/2158/606123
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 10
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 10
social impact