Background: A clinical classification of surface defects in gingival recession area is proposed. Methods: Two factors were evaluated to set up a classification system: presence (A) or absence (B) of cemento‐enamel junction (CEJ) and presence (+) or absence (−) of dental surface discrepancy caused by abrasion (step). Four classes (A+, A−, B+, and B−) were identified on the basis of these variables. To validate the classification three different calibrated examiners applied the proposed classification system to 46 gingival recessions and κ statistics were performed. The classification was used on 1,010 gingival recessions from 353 patients to examine the distribution of the four classes. Results: The κ statistics for intrarater agreement ranged from 0.74 to 0.95 (almost perfect agreement), whereas interrater agreement ranged from 0.26 to 0.59 (moderate agreement). Out of 1,010 exposed root surfaces associated with gingival recession, 144 showed an identifiable CEJ associated with a root surface defect (Class A+, 14%); 469 an identifiable CEJ without any associated step (Class A−, 46%); 244 an unidentifiable CEJ with a step (Class B+, 24%); and 153 an unidentifiable CEJ without any associated step (Class B−, 15%). Conclusion: The proposed classification describes the dental surface defects that are of paramount importance in diagnosing gingival recession areas.

Classification of dental surface defects in areas of gingival recession / Pini-Prato G;Franceschi D;Cairo F;Nieri M;Rotundo R. - In: JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY. - ISSN 0022-3492. - ELETTRONICO. - 81:(2010), pp. 885-890. [10.1902/jop.2010.090631]

Classification of dental surface defects in areas of gingival recession.

Franceschi D;CAIRO, FRANCESCO;ROTUNDO, ROBERTO
2010

Abstract

Background: A clinical classification of surface defects in gingival recession area is proposed. Methods: Two factors were evaluated to set up a classification system: presence (A) or absence (B) of cemento‐enamel junction (CEJ) and presence (+) or absence (−) of dental surface discrepancy caused by abrasion (step). Four classes (A+, A−, B+, and B−) were identified on the basis of these variables. To validate the classification three different calibrated examiners applied the proposed classification system to 46 gingival recessions and κ statistics were performed. The classification was used on 1,010 gingival recessions from 353 patients to examine the distribution of the four classes. Results: The κ statistics for intrarater agreement ranged from 0.74 to 0.95 (almost perfect agreement), whereas interrater agreement ranged from 0.26 to 0.59 (moderate agreement). Out of 1,010 exposed root surfaces associated with gingival recession, 144 showed an identifiable CEJ associated with a root surface defect (Class A+, 14%); 469 an identifiable CEJ without any associated step (Class A−, 46%); 244 an unidentifiable CEJ with a step (Class B+, 24%); and 153 an unidentifiable CEJ without any associated step (Class B−, 15%). Conclusion: The proposed classification describes the dental surface defects that are of paramount importance in diagnosing gingival recession areas.
2010
81
885
890
Pini-Prato G;Franceschi D;Cairo F;Nieri M;Rotundo R
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Classification root.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione finale referata (Postprint, Accepted manuscript)
Licenza: Open Access
Dimensione 1.42 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.42 MB Adobe PDF

I documenti in FLORE sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificatore per citare o creare un link a questa risorsa: https://hdl.handle.net/2158/773993
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 81
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 90
social impact