A study concerning a double-storey extension on top of an existing reinforced concrete (R/C) apartment building is carried out for two different steel structural solutions. A traditional bracing configuration, and a dissipative bracing technology incorporating pressurised fluid viscous spring-dampers, are selected for the two hypotheses. The gravity load-bearing system is assumed to be coincident, in order to directly compare the seismic response capacities of the bracing systems. Furthermore, the following mutual design objectives are fixed: attaining operational, and immediate occupancy non-structural performance levels at frequent design earthquake and serviceability design earthquake levels, respectively; and limiting strengthening interventions on the R/C structure to jacketing maximum 20% of columns, and adding a thin R/C slab over the foundations. These objectives are reached at virtually coinciding costs. On the other hand, the viscous-dissipative bracing design shows substantially higher seismic performance at basic design and maximum considered earthquake levels, as well as lower architectural intrusion, as compared to the traditional bracing solution.

Traditional and viscous dissipative steel braced top addition strategies for a R/C building / Sorace, S; Terenzi, G; Licari, M. - In: INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING. - ISSN 1758-7328. - STAMPA. - 6:(2015), pp. 332-353. [10.1504/IJSTRUCTE.2015.072472]

Traditional and viscous dissipative steel braced top addition strategies for a R/C building

TERENZI, GLORIA;
2015

Abstract

A study concerning a double-storey extension on top of an existing reinforced concrete (R/C) apartment building is carried out for two different steel structural solutions. A traditional bracing configuration, and a dissipative bracing technology incorporating pressurised fluid viscous spring-dampers, are selected for the two hypotheses. The gravity load-bearing system is assumed to be coincident, in order to directly compare the seismic response capacities of the bracing systems. Furthermore, the following mutual design objectives are fixed: attaining operational, and immediate occupancy non-structural performance levels at frequent design earthquake and serviceability design earthquake levels, respectively; and limiting strengthening interventions on the R/C structure to jacketing maximum 20% of columns, and adding a thin R/C slab over the foundations. These objectives are reached at virtually coinciding costs. On the other hand, the viscous-dissipative bracing design shows substantially higher seismic performance at basic design and maximum considered earthquake levels, as well as lower architectural intrusion, as compared to the traditional bracing solution.
2015
6
332
353
Sorace, S; Terenzi, G; Licari, M
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
IJSTRUCTE060403 SORACE.pdf

Accesso chiuso

Descrizione: Articolo pubblicato
Tipologia: Pdf editoriale (Version of record)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati
Dimensione 2.82 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.82 MB Adobe PDF   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in FLORE sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificatore per citare o creare un link a questa risorsa: https://hdl.handle.net/2158/1009930
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 4
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact