Different numerical methods for blade flutter analysis were employed to evaluate the flutter stability of a typical low pressure turbine bladerow tested in the context of the European research project FUTURE. This aeroelastic testcase was extensively studied during the project by a large number of partners, becoming a suitable benchmark to compare numerical techniques for flutter prediction. In this study, two different uncoupled aeroelastic methods (time-linearized and non-linear) were used to assess the flutter stability. The results highlight a very good agreement between the two approaches even when the non-linear code was applied with some approximation strategies (non viscous endwalls and wall functions). The two analyzed bladerow configurations (cantilever and interlock) show unstable and stable flutter behavior respectively, and the numerical flutter predictions are in agreement with the experimental evidences obtained during the project. Finally the two methods were also evaluated in terms of computational time. This is due to the fact that flutter assessment methods are more and more used during the turbomachinery design, even during the bladerow optimization.

Evaluation of Fast Numerical Methods for Turbomachinery Blade Flutter Analysis / Pinelli, Lorenzo; Poli, Francesco; Bellucci, Juri; Giovannini, Matteo; Arnone, Andrea. - ELETTRONICO. - (2015), pp. 0-0. (Intervento presentato al convegno 14th International Symposium on Unsteady Aerodynamics, Aeroacoustics and Aeroelasticity of Turbomachines (ISUAAAT) tenutosi a Stockholm, Sweden nel September 8–11).

Evaluation of Fast Numerical Methods for Turbomachinery Blade Flutter Analysis

PINELLI, LORENZO;POLI, FRANCESCO;BELLUCCI, JURI;GIOVANNINI, MATTEO;ARNONE, ANDREA
2015

Abstract

Different numerical methods for blade flutter analysis were employed to evaluate the flutter stability of a typical low pressure turbine bladerow tested in the context of the European research project FUTURE. This aeroelastic testcase was extensively studied during the project by a large number of partners, becoming a suitable benchmark to compare numerical techniques for flutter prediction. In this study, two different uncoupled aeroelastic methods (time-linearized and non-linear) were used to assess the flutter stability. The results highlight a very good agreement between the two approaches even when the non-linear code was applied with some approximation strategies (non viscous endwalls and wall functions). The two analyzed bladerow configurations (cantilever and interlock) show unstable and stable flutter behavior respectively, and the numerical flutter predictions are in agreement with the experimental evidences obtained during the project. Finally the two methods were also evaluated in terms of computational time. This is due to the fact that flutter assessment methods are more and more used during the turbomachinery design, even during the bladerow optimization.
2015
Conference proceedings
14th International Symposium on Unsteady Aerodynamics, Aeroacoustics and Aeroelasticity of Turbomachines (ISUAAAT)
Stockholm, Sweden
September 8–11
Pinelli, Lorenzo; Poli, Francesco; Bellucci, Juri; Giovannini, Matteo; Arnone, Andrea
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in FLORE sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificatore per citare o creare un link a questa risorsa: https://hdl.handle.net/2158/1014055
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact