OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to compare myocardial blood flow (MBF) and myocardial flow reserve (MFR) estimates from rubidium-82 positron emission tomography ((82)Rb PET) data using 10 software packages (SPs) based on 8 tracer kinetic models. BACKGROUND: It is unknown how MBF and MFR values from existing SPs agree for (82)Rb PET. METHODS: Rest and stress (82)Rb PET scans of 48 patients with suspected or known coronary artery disease were analyzed in 10 centers. Each center used 1 of 10 SPs to analyze global and regional MBF using the different kinetic models implemented. Values were considered to agree if they simultaneously had an intraclass correlation coefficient >0.75 and a difference <20% of the median across all programs. RESULTS: The most common model evaluated was the Ottawa Heart Institute 1-tissue compartment model (OHI-1-TCM). MBF values from 7 of 8 SPs implementing this model agreed best. Values from 2 other models (alternative 1-TCM and Axially distributed) also agreed well, with occasional differences. The MBF results from other models (e.g., 2-TCM and retention) were less in agreement with values from OHI-1-TCM. CONCLUSIONS: SPs using the most common kinetic model-OHI-1-TCM-provided consistent results in measuring global and regional MBF values, suggesting that they may be used interchangeably to process data acquired with a common imaging protocol.

Quantification of myocardial blood flow in absolute terms using (82)Rb PET imaging: the RUBY-10 Study / Nesterov, Sv; Deshayes, E; Sciagrà, R; Settimo, L; Declerck, Jm; Pan, Xb; Yoshinaga, K; Katoh, C; Slomka, Pj; Germano, G; Han, C; Aalto, V; Alessio, Am; Ficaro, Ep; Lee, Bc; Nekolla, Sg; Gwet, Kl; Dekemp, Ra; Klein, R; Dickson, J; Case, Ja; Bateman, T; Prior, Jo; Knuuti, Jm.. - In: JACC. CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING. - ISSN 1936-878X. - STAMPA. - 7:(2014), pp. 1119-1127. [10.1016/j.jcmg.2014.08.003]

Quantification of myocardial blood flow in absolute terms using (82)Rb PET imaging: the RUBY-10 Study.

SCIAGRA', ROBERTO;
2014

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to compare myocardial blood flow (MBF) and myocardial flow reserve (MFR) estimates from rubidium-82 positron emission tomography ((82)Rb PET) data using 10 software packages (SPs) based on 8 tracer kinetic models. BACKGROUND: It is unknown how MBF and MFR values from existing SPs agree for (82)Rb PET. METHODS: Rest and stress (82)Rb PET scans of 48 patients with suspected or known coronary artery disease were analyzed in 10 centers. Each center used 1 of 10 SPs to analyze global and regional MBF using the different kinetic models implemented. Values were considered to agree if they simultaneously had an intraclass correlation coefficient >0.75 and a difference <20% of the median across all programs. RESULTS: The most common model evaluated was the Ottawa Heart Institute 1-tissue compartment model (OHI-1-TCM). MBF values from 7 of 8 SPs implementing this model agreed best. Values from 2 other models (alternative 1-TCM and Axially distributed) also agreed well, with occasional differences. The MBF results from other models (e.g., 2-TCM and retention) were less in agreement with values from OHI-1-TCM. CONCLUSIONS: SPs using the most common kinetic model-OHI-1-TCM-provided consistent results in measuring global and regional MBF values, suggesting that they may be used interchangeably to process data acquired with a common imaging protocol.
2014
7
1119
1127
Nesterov, Sv; Deshayes, E; Sciagrà, R; Settimo, L; Declerck, Jm; Pan, Xb; Yoshinaga, K; Katoh, C; Slomka, Pj; Germano, G; Han, C; Aalto, V; Alessio, A...espandi
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Ruby_10_JACCImg.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: Articolo
Tipologia: Pdf editoriale (Version of record)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati
Dimensione 1.02 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.02 MB Adobe PDF

I documenti in FLORE sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificatore per citare o creare un link a questa risorsa: https://hdl.handle.net/2158/1017331
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 148
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 141
social impact