Background and Purpose-In patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), stroke risk stratification schema do not consider AF parameters. The aim of the study is to assess the impact of combining risk factors with continuous AF burden monitoring. Methods-In this retrospective study 568 patients implanted with a DDDR-P pacemaker (AT-500; Medtronic) and a history of AF were continuously monitored for 1 year. Results-During follow-up, 14 patients (2.5%) had a thromboembolic event. Patients were divided into 3 groups: AF burden <= 5 minutes per day (AF-free; n = 223 [39%]), AF burden >5 minutes but <24 hours per day (AF-5 minutes; n = 179 [32%]), and AF burden >= 24 hours (AF-24 hours; n = 166 [29%]). Patients were also classified according to CHADS(2) and CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc risk scores. The discrimination ability of each risk score was evaluated performing a logistic regression analysis and calculating the corresponding C-statistic. The addition of AF burden improved C-statistics: for CHADS2 from 0.653 (P = 0.051) to 0.713 (P = 0.007); for CHA2DS2-VASc, from 0.898 (P < 0.0001) to 0.910 (P < 0.0001). Conclusions-The CHA2DS2-VASc score had a high sensitivity to predict thromboembolism. Implementation of device data on AF presence/duration/burden has the potential to contribute to improved clinical risk stratification and should be tested prospectively. (Stroke. 2011; 42: 1768-1770.)

Improving stroke risk stratification using the CHADS2 and CHA2DS2-VASc risk scores in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation by continuous arrhythmia burden monitoring / Boriani, Giuseppe; Botto, Giovanni Luca; Padeletti, Luigi; Santini, Massimo; Capucci, Alessandro; Gulizia, Michele; Ricci, Renato; Biffi, Mauro; De Santo, Tiziana; Corbucci, Giorgio; Lip, Gregory Y.H.. - In: STROKE. - ISSN 0039-2499. - ELETTRONICO. - 42:(2011), pp. 1768-1770. [10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.609297]

Improving stroke risk stratification using the CHADS2 and CHA2DS2-VASc risk scores in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation by continuous arrhythmia burden monitoring

PADELETTI, LUIGI;
2011

Abstract

Background and Purpose-In patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), stroke risk stratification schema do not consider AF parameters. The aim of the study is to assess the impact of combining risk factors with continuous AF burden monitoring. Methods-In this retrospective study 568 patients implanted with a DDDR-P pacemaker (AT-500; Medtronic) and a history of AF were continuously monitored for 1 year. Results-During follow-up, 14 patients (2.5%) had a thromboembolic event. Patients were divided into 3 groups: AF burden <= 5 minutes per day (AF-free; n = 223 [39%]), AF burden >5 minutes but <24 hours per day (AF-5 minutes; n = 179 [32%]), and AF burden >= 24 hours (AF-24 hours; n = 166 [29%]). Patients were also classified according to CHADS(2) and CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc risk scores. The discrimination ability of each risk score was evaluated performing a logistic regression analysis and calculating the corresponding C-statistic. The addition of AF burden improved C-statistics: for CHADS2 from 0.653 (P = 0.051) to 0.713 (P = 0.007); for CHA2DS2-VASc, from 0.898 (P < 0.0001) to 0.910 (P < 0.0001). Conclusions-The CHA2DS2-VASc score had a high sensitivity to predict thromboembolism. Implementation of device data on AF presence/duration/burden has the potential to contribute to improved clinical risk stratification and should be tested prospectively. (Stroke. 2011; 42: 1768-1770.)
2011
42
1768
1770
Boriani, Giuseppe; Botto, Giovanni Luca; Padeletti, Luigi; Santini, Massimo; Capucci, Alessandro; Gulizia, Michele; Ricci, Renato; Biffi, Mauro; De Sa...espandi
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Stroke-2011-Boriani-1768-70.pdf

Accesso chiuso

Tipologia: Pdf editoriale (Version of record)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati
Dimensione 638.87 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
638.87 kB Adobe PDF   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in FLORE sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificatore per citare o creare un link a questa risorsa: https://hdl.handle.net/2158/1025228
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 190
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 164
social impact