Major trauma is a leading cause of death, particularly amongst young patients. Conventional therapies for post-traumatic cardiovascular shock and acute pulmonary failure may sometimes be insufficient and even dangerous. New approaches to trauma care and novel salvage techniques are necessary to improve outcomes. Extracorporeal life support (ECLS) has proven to be effective in acute cardiopulmonary failure from different etiologies, particularly when conventional therapies fail. Since 2008 we have used ECLS as a rescue therapy in severe poly-trauma patients with refractory clinical setting (cardiogenic shock, cardiac arrest, and/or pulmonary failure). The rationale for using ECLS in trauma patients is to support cardiopulmonary function, providing adequate systemic perfusion and, therefore, avoiding consequent multi-organ failure and permitting organ recovery. From our data ECLS, utilizing heparin-coated support to avoid systemic anticoagulation, is a valuable option to support severely injured patients when conventional therapies are insufficient. It is safe, feasible, and effective in providing hemodynamic support and blood-gas exchange. Moreover, we have identified several pre-ECLS patient characteristics useful in predicting ECLS treatment appropriateness in severe poly-traumatized patients. These might be helpful in deciding whether the ECLS should be initiated in patients who are severely complex and compromised. Future improvements in materials and techniques are expected to make ECLS even easier and safer to manage, leading to a further extension of its use in severely injured patients.

Extracorporeal life support in polytraumatized patients / Bonacchi, Massimo. - In: INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY. - ISSN 1743-9191. - STAMPA. - 33:(2016), pp. 213-217. [10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.11.001]

Extracorporeal life support in polytraumatized patients

BONACCHI, MASSIMO
2016

Abstract

Major trauma is a leading cause of death, particularly amongst young patients. Conventional therapies for post-traumatic cardiovascular shock and acute pulmonary failure may sometimes be insufficient and even dangerous. New approaches to trauma care and novel salvage techniques are necessary to improve outcomes. Extracorporeal life support (ECLS) has proven to be effective in acute cardiopulmonary failure from different etiologies, particularly when conventional therapies fail. Since 2008 we have used ECLS as a rescue therapy in severe poly-trauma patients with refractory clinical setting (cardiogenic shock, cardiac arrest, and/or pulmonary failure). The rationale for using ECLS in trauma patients is to support cardiopulmonary function, providing adequate systemic perfusion and, therefore, avoiding consequent multi-organ failure and permitting organ recovery. From our data ECLS, utilizing heparin-coated support to avoid systemic anticoagulation, is a valuable option to support severely injured patients when conventional therapies are insufficient. It is safe, feasible, and effective in providing hemodynamic support and blood-gas exchange. Moreover, we have identified several pre-ECLS patient characteristics useful in predicting ECLS treatment appropriateness in severe poly-traumatized patients. These might be helpful in deciding whether the ECLS should be initiated in patients who are severely complex and compromised. Future improvements in materials and techniques are expected to make ECLS even easier and safer to manage, leading to a further extension of its use in severely injured patients.
2016
33
213
217
Bonacchi, Massimo
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
1-s2.0-S1743919115013059-main.pdf

Accesso chiuso

Descrizione: Full-text
Tipologia: Pdf editoriale (Version of record)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati
Dimensione 772.8 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
772.8 kB Adobe PDF   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in FLORE sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificatore per citare o creare un link a questa risorsa: https://hdl.handle.net/2158/1060698
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 5
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 3
social impact