OBJECTIVE: This study is aimed at the comparison between an individual and a group cognitive-behavioral program for the treatment of obesity. DESIGN: Parallel series, prospective, 3-year study. A group program of 10 weekly sessions focused on lifestyle modification was compared with a similar, individual 10-session program. Fifty-seven patients were assigned to individual treatment, and 84 patients to the group program. SUBJECTS: One hundred- forty-one obese female outpatients without binge eating disorder, aged 42.0+/-11.6 years (m+/-SD), with Body Mass Index (BMI) 37.3+/-5.2 kg/m(2). MEASUREMENTS: BMI and waist circumference were measured at 0, 6, 12 and 36 months. Analysis was performed on an intention-to-treat basis. RESULTS: Mean weight loss was superior with the group program at 6 months (2.0+/-3.9 vs 0.8+/-2.5 kg/m(2); p<0.05), while no difference between the two treatments was observed at 12 and 36 months. Mean waist circumference was significantly different at 6 months (group 97.4+/-2.5 vs individual 102.9+/-2.4, p<0.05), still remaining superior in the patients following individual treatment (100.2+/-5.0 vs 103.7+/-5.9) at 12 months, while no difference between the two treatments was observed at 36 months. The proportion of patients losing more than 5% of initial body weight with the group program (16.6, 15.5, and 38.1% at 6, 12, and 36 months, respectively) was not significantly different from that observed with individual treatment (5.3, 14.0, and 35.0%, respectively). CONCLUSION: A group cognitive-behavioral program for the treatment of obesity is not inferior to a similar program applied in individual setting, and it may enhance weight loss (especially fat mass, according to the waist measurement) in the short term.
Group versus individual cognitive-behavioral treatment for obesity: Results after 36 months / Cresci, B.; Tesi, F.; La Ferlita, T.; Ricca, V.; Ravaldi, C.; Rotella, Carlo Maria; Mannucci, E.. - In: EATING AND WEIGHT DISORDERS. - ISSN 1124-4909. - STAMPA. - 12:(2007), pp. 147-153.
Group versus individual cognitive-behavioral treatment for obesity: Results after 36 months
CRESCI, BARBARA;RICCA, VALDO;RAVALDI, CLAUDIA;ROTELLA, CARLO MARIA;MANNUCCI, EDOARDO
2007
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This study is aimed at the comparison between an individual and a group cognitive-behavioral program for the treatment of obesity. DESIGN: Parallel series, prospective, 3-year study. A group program of 10 weekly sessions focused on lifestyle modification was compared with a similar, individual 10-session program. Fifty-seven patients were assigned to individual treatment, and 84 patients to the group program. SUBJECTS: One hundred- forty-one obese female outpatients without binge eating disorder, aged 42.0+/-11.6 years (m+/-SD), with Body Mass Index (BMI) 37.3+/-5.2 kg/m(2). MEASUREMENTS: BMI and waist circumference were measured at 0, 6, 12 and 36 months. Analysis was performed on an intention-to-treat basis. RESULTS: Mean weight loss was superior with the group program at 6 months (2.0+/-3.9 vs 0.8+/-2.5 kg/m(2); p<0.05), while no difference between the two treatments was observed at 12 and 36 months. Mean waist circumference was significantly different at 6 months (group 97.4+/-2.5 vs individual 102.9+/-2.4, p<0.05), still remaining superior in the patients following individual treatment (100.2+/-5.0 vs 103.7+/-5.9) at 12 months, while no difference between the two treatments was observed at 36 months. The proportion of patients losing more than 5% of initial body weight with the group program (16.6, 15.5, and 38.1% at 6, 12, and 36 months, respectively) was not significantly different from that observed with individual treatment (5.3, 14.0, and 35.0%, respectively). CONCLUSION: A group cognitive-behavioral program for the treatment of obesity is not inferior to a similar program applied in individual setting, and it may enhance weight loss (especially fat mass, according to the waist measurement) in the short term.I documenti in FLORE sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.