ABSTRACT Points of agreement with categories of resumed speech in the C-Or-DiAL corpus show, thanks to corpus-driven analyses, that in dialogue there are marked breaks in various circumstances and with various characteristics: breaks produced by the speaker at the end of an overlapping of speech or an insertion on the part of an interlocutor; breaks that occur at the end of a speech tactic such as resonance or connective echoing in order to enter a discussion or to continue speaking; breaks characteristic of a dialogue between an author and himself, that is, breaks that precede brief self-confirmation or self-correction, without deviating from dialogue with the interlocutor; breaks that indicate a minimal interruption of what is being said in that they respond, through the use of a monosyllable, to what the interlocutor is suggesting or proposing; breaks that mark a pause in speech because the discourse is momentarily dropped in order to respond to the interlocutor. Making this classification implies that there is a method involved in this phenomenon typical of the process of discourse.

Análisis de las concordancias con etiqueta de reinicio en C-Or-DiAL: contextos dialógicos / Nicolas Martinez, Maria Carlota. - In: LEA. LINGÜÍSTICA ESPAÑOLA ACTUAL. - ISSN 0210-6345. - STAMPA. - XXXVII/2 2015:(2015), pp. 215-240.

Análisis de las concordancias con etiqueta de reinicio en C-Or-DiAL: contextos dialógicos

NICOLAS MARTINEZ, MARIA CARLOTA
2015

Abstract

ABSTRACT Points of agreement with categories of resumed speech in the C-Or-DiAL corpus show, thanks to corpus-driven analyses, that in dialogue there are marked breaks in various circumstances and with various characteristics: breaks produced by the speaker at the end of an overlapping of speech or an insertion on the part of an interlocutor; breaks that occur at the end of a speech tactic such as resonance or connective echoing in order to enter a discussion or to continue speaking; breaks characteristic of a dialogue between an author and himself, that is, breaks that precede brief self-confirmation or self-correction, without deviating from dialogue with the interlocutor; breaks that indicate a minimal interruption of what is being said in that they respond, through the use of a monosyllable, to what the interlocutor is suggesting or proposing; breaks that mark a pause in speech because the discourse is momentarily dropped in order to respond to the interlocutor. Making this classification implies that there is a method involved in this phenomenon typical of the process of discourse.
2015
XXXVII/2 2015
215
240
Nicolas Martinez, Maria Carlota
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in FLORE sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificatore per citare o creare un link a questa risorsa: https://hdl.handle.net/2158/1075528
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact