After the Second World War, capitalist economies were affected by inclusive growth. In the last decades, this trend has changed. Economic growth in the advanced countries slowed down and associated to increasing social inequalities. However, there are significant differences among countries. Some of them were affected by higher rates of growth and high degrees of inequalities. Others showed economic dynamism with more limited social inequalities. The worst case involved low growth and extended inequalities. The literature on the varieties of capitalism has offered interesting hypotheses to explain such differences, and therefore to shed light on the institutional bases of models that are more compatible with inclusive growth. However, this literature has mainly looked at the connections among economic and social policies and usually considered institutional assets as given. The aim of this paper is to propose a new comparative research agenda that could enhance the analytical tools of the varieties of capitalism. In this perspective, attention is drawn to the role of politics in shaping regulative policies by assessing empirical and theoretical links between types of democracy (majoritarian vs. consensual) and models of capitalism. Politics has been overlooked so far, but it appears crucial in order to understand the economic as well as the political conditions of an inclusive growth: its origins and its future.

Tipi di democrazia e modelli di capitalismo: un’agenda di ricerca / Trigilia, Carlo. - In: STATO E MERCATO. - ISSN 0392-9701. - STAMPA. - (2016), pp. 183-214. [10.1425/84067]

Tipi di democrazia e modelli di capitalismo: un’agenda di ricerca

TRIGILIA, CARLO
2016

Abstract

After the Second World War, capitalist economies were affected by inclusive growth. In the last decades, this trend has changed. Economic growth in the advanced countries slowed down and associated to increasing social inequalities. However, there are significant differences among countries. Some of them were affected by higher rates of growth and high degrees of inequalities. Others showed economic dynamism with more limited social inequalities. The worst case involved low growth and extended inequalities. The literature on the varieties of capitalism has offered interesting hypotheses to explain such differences, and therefore to shed light on the institutional bases of models that are more compatible with inclusive growth. However, this literature has mainly looked at the connections among economic and social policies and usually considered institutional assets as given. The aim of this paper is to propose a new comparative research agenda that could enhance the analytical tools of the varieties of capitalism. In this perspective, attention is drawn to the role of politics in shaping regulative policies by assessing empirical and theoretical links between types of democracy (majoritarian vs. consensual) and models of capitalism. Politics has been overlooked so far, but it appears crucial in order to understand the economic as well as the political conditions of an inclusive growth: its origins and its future.
2016
183
214
Trigilia, Carlo
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
TRIGILIA_Tipi di democrazie e modelli di campitalismo_2016.pdf

Accesso chiuso

Tipologia: Pdf editoriale (Version of record)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati
Dimensione 277.55 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
277.55 kB Adobe PDF   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in FLORE sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificatore per citare o creare un link a questa risorsa: https://hdl.handle.net/2158/1081617
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 11
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact