The assessment of the structural vulnerability for existing buildings in Italy is a key aspect for the seismic risk reduction, in particular for strategic and relevant buildings, because of their importance for the civil protection. Different approaches can be used: expeditious/empirical methods, based on qualitative evaluations, analytical methods, based on detailed models, or hybrid methods, based instead on simplified numerical models. In case of a wide sample of buildings, the use of empirical methods is necessary in order to obtain a first screening of the buildings and to delineate a vulnerability classification, which can be used as a priority list for further detailed analyses. In this work, the comparison among an empirical approach (Vulnerability Index Method, G.N.D.T., 1993) and a detailed approach (pushover analysis) on a sample of 20 masonry hospital structures is carried out. The critical analysis of the results has allowed the development of a new empirical assessment procedure, able to estimate the peak ground acceleration of capacity of masonry structures, using the information required by the II Level Vulnerability Form (G.N.D.T., 1993).

Seismic vulnerability analysis for masonry hospital structures: Expeditious and detailed methods / Ciavattone, A.; Vignoli, A.; Matthies, H.G.. - STAMPA. - (2016), pp. 2381-2390. (Intervento presentato al convegno 16th International Brick and Block Masonry Conference, IBMAC 2016 tenutosi a italia nel 2016).

Seismic vulnerability analysis for masonry hospital structures: Expeditious and detailed methods

CIAVATTONE, ALBERTO;VIGNOLI, ANDREA;
2016

Abstract

The assessment of the structural vulnerability for existing buildings in Italy is a key aspect for the seismic risk reduction, in particular for strategic and relevant buildings, because of their importance for the civil protection. Different approaches can be used: expeditious/empirical methods, based on qualitative evaluations, analytical methods, based on detailed models, or hybrid methods, based instead on simplified numerical models. In case of a wide sample of buildings, the use of empirical methods is necessary in order to obtain a first screening of the buildings and to delineate a vulnerability classification, which can be used as a priority list for further detailed analyses. In this work, the comparison among an empirical approach (Vulnerability Index Method, G.N.D.T., 1993) and a detailed approach (pushover analysis) on a sample of 20 masonry hospital structures is carried out. The critical analysis of the results has allowed the development of a new empirical assessment procedure, able to estimate the peak ground acceleration of capacity of masonry structures, using the information required by the II Level Vulnerability Form (G.N.D.T., 1993).
2016
Brick and Block Masonry: Trends, Innovations and Challenges - Proceedings of the 16th International Brick and Block Masonry Conference, IBMAC 2016
16th International Brick and Block Masonry Conference, IBMAC 2016
italia
2016
Ciavattone, A.; Vignoli, A.; Matthies, H.G.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Seismic vulnerability analysis for masonry hospital structures_Expeditious and detailed methods.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: Articolo principale
Tipologia: Pdf editoriale (Version of record)
Licenza: Open Access
Dimensione 600.02 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
600.02 kB Adobe PDF

I documenti in FLORE sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificatore per citare o creare un link a questa risorsa: https://hdl.handle.net/2158/1086420
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 1
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact