A novel aluminizing process based upon room temperature Al‐electrodeposition from Ionic Liquids followed by diffusion heat treatment was applied on bare‐ and CoNiCrAlY‐coated Inconel 738 (IN738). The aluminized samples were tested by isothermal oxidation at 1000 °C in air. The microstructural and chemical evolution of the samples were determined as function of oxidation time and compared with the currently applied coatings obtained via pack cementation. The newly proposed method is suitable for the CoNiCrAlY coating, but not for the bare IN738. In the latter, the formed Al‐enriched layer is much thinner and the anticorrosion properties resulted in being reduced. This is probably due to the presence of precipitates, which slow down the aluminum inward diffusion impairing the formation of a well‐developed interdiffusion zone (IDZ). Traces of the electrolyte, embedded during the Al‐electrodeposition process, can be seen as the origin of these precipitates.
Aluminizing via Ionic liquid electrodeposition and pack cementation: A comparative study with inconel 738 and a CoNiCrAlY / Tagliaferri, Luca; Berretti, Enrico; Giaccherini, Andrea; Martinuzzi, Stefano M.; Bozza, Francesco; Thoma, Martin; Bardi, Ugo; Caporali, Stefano. - In: COATINGS. - ISSN 2079-6412. - STAMPA. - 7:(2017), pp. 1-12. [10.3390/coatings7060083]
Aluminizing via Ionic liquid electrodeposition and pack cementation: A comparative study with inconel 738 and a CoNiCrAlY
BERRETTI, ENRICO;GIACCHERINI, ANDREA;Martinuzzi, Stefano M.;BARDI, UGO;CAPORALI, STEFANO
2017
Abstract
A novel aluminizing process based upon room temperature Al‐electrodeposition from Ionic Liquids followed by diffusion heat treatment was applied on bare‐ and CoNiCrAlY‐coated Inconel 738 (IN738). The aluminized samples were tested by isothermal oxidation at 1000 °C in air. The microstructural and chemical evolution of the samples were determined as function of oxidation time and compared with the currently applied coatings obtained via pack cementation. The newly proposed method is suitable for the CoNiCrAlY coating, but not for the bare IN738. In the latter, the formed Al‐enriched layer is much thinner and the anticorrosion properties resulted in being reduced. This is probably due to the presence of precipitates, which slow down the aluminum inward diffusion impairing the formation of a well‐developed interdiffusion zone (IDZ). Traces of the electrolyte, embedded during the Al‐electrodeposition process, can be seen as the origin of these precipitates.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
coatings-published.pdf
accesso aperto
Descrizione: articolo principale
Tipologia:
Pdf editoriale (Version of record)
Licenza:
Open Access
Dimensione
3.45 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
3.45 MB | Adobe PDF | |
coatings-published.pdf
accesso aperto
Descrizione: articolo principale
Tipologia:
Pdf editoriale (Version of record)
Licenza:
Open Access
Dimensione
3.45 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
3.45 MB | Adobe PDF |
I documenti in FLORE sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.