Goal Controversies exist regarding the treatment of advanced laryngeal carcinomas. The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate the oncologic outcomes of both transoral laser and open partial laryngectomies for advanced (T3–T4) squamous cell laryngeal cancers management. Introduction A systematic review of literature was led searching for articles mentioning the following terms: advanced (T3–T4) laryngeal cancer AND laser; AND open partial laryngectomy; AND transoral laser microsurgery; AND cordectomy; AND conservative surgery; AND tra- cheohyoidopexy or tracheohyoidoepiglottopexy; AND supratracheal partial laryngectomy; AND supracricoid par- tial laryngectomy; AND cricohyoidopexy or cricohyoidoe- piglottopexy. Then a quantitative analysis was carried on papers published after 1980. Discussion The search identified 110 publications, and a total of 21 articles satisfied inclusion criteria and were selected for quantitative synthesis. 10 out of 21 studies had a good quality score, 10 were fair and only one rated a poor score. The pooled disease-free survival (DFS) was 79% (95% CI 74–85), and pooled overall survival (OS) was 71% (95% CI 64–78) at 5 years from all 1921 patients included in the study, with signi cant heterogeneity (I2 = 89.7% and I2 = 90.4%), respectively. Significant heterogeneity value (p = 0.118) was seen by comparing transoral laser and open partial laryngectomies in terms of DFS.Conclusion The two surgical techniques are both valid conservative surgical options for advanced laryngeal cancer treatment.
Conservative treatment for advanced T3–T4 laryngeal cancer: meta-analysis of key oncological outcomes / Giuditta, Mannell; Lazio, MARIA SILVIA; Luparello, Paolo; Gallo, Oreste. - In: EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY. - ISSN 0937-4477. - STAMPA. - 275:(2017), pp. 1-12. [10.1007/s00405-017-4799-x]
Conservative treatment for advanced T3–T4 laryngeal cancer: meta-analysis of key oncological outcomes
LAZIO, MARIA SILVIA;LUPARELLO, PAOLO;GALLO, ORESTE;MANNELLI, GIUDITTA
2017
Abstract
Goal Controversies exist regarding the treatment of advanced laryngeal carcinomas. The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate the oncologic outcomes of both transoral laser and open partial laryngectomies for advanced (T3–T4) squamous cell laryngeal cancers management. Introduction A systematic review of literature was led searching for articles mentioning the following terms: advanced (T3–T4) laryngeal cancer AND laser; AND open partial laryngectomy; AND transoral laser microsurgery; AND cordectomy; AND conservative surgery; AND tra- cheohyoidopexy or tracheohyoidoepiglottopexy; AND supratracheal partial laryngectomy; AND supracricoid par- tial laryngectomy; AND cricohyoidopexy or cricohyoidoe- piglottopexy. Then a quantitative analysis was carried on papers published after 1980. Discussion The search identified 110 publications, and a total of 21 articles satisfied inclusion criteria and were selected for quantitative synthesis. 10 out of 21 studies had a good quality score, 10 were fair and only one rated a poor score. The pooled disease-free survival (DFS) was 79% (95% CI 74–85), and pooled overall survival (OS) was 71% (95% CI 64–78) at 5 years from all 1921 patients included in the study, with signi cant heterogeneity (I2 = 89.7% and I2 = 90.4%), respectively. Significant heterogeneity value (p = 0.118) was seen by comparing transoral laser and open partial laryngectomies in terms of DFS.Conclusion The two surgical techniques are both valid conservative surgical options for advanced laryngeal cancer treatment.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
28. T3-T4 meta-analysis EAORL.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Pdf editoriale (Version of record)
Licenza:
Open Access
Dimensione
1.72 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.72 MB | Adobe PDF |
I documenti in FLORE sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.