Introduction – For the determination of harpagoside and the wide phenolic pattern in Harpagophytum procumbens root and its commercial food supplements, dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction (DLLME), ultrasound-assisted DLLME (UA-DLLME), and sugaring-out liquid–liquid extraction (SULLE) were tested and compared. Objectives – In order to optimise the extraction efficiency, DLLME and UA-DLLMEwere performed in different solvents (water and aqueous solutions of glucose, β-cyclodextrin, (2-hydroxypropyl)-β-cyclodextrin, sodium chloride, natural deep eutectic solvent, and ionic liquid). Material andMethods – The plantmaterial was ground and sieved to obtain a uniformgranulometry before extraction. Commercial food supplements, containing H. procumbens are commercially available in Italy. Results – The most effective sodium chloride-aided-DLLME was then optimised and applied for analyses followed by HPLC-PDA. For comparison, microwave-assisted extraction was performed using the same solvents and the best results were obtained using 1% of β-cyclodextrin or 15% of sodium chloride. Conclusion – All commercial samples respected the European Pharmacopoeia monograph for this plant material, showing a harpagoside content ≥ 1.2%.
Use of Innovative (Micro)Extraction Techniques to Characterise Harpagophytum procumbens Root and its Commercial Food Supplements / Diuzheva, Alina; Carradori, Simone; Andruch, Vasil; Locatelli, Marcello; Luca, Elisa De; Tiecco, Matteo; Germani, Raimondo; Menghini, Luigi; Nocentini, Alessio; Gratteri, Paola; Campestre, Cristina. - In: PHYTOCHEMICAL ANALYSIS. - ISSN 0958-0344. - STAMPA. - 29:(2018), pp. 233-241. [10.1002/pca.2737]
Use of Innovative (Micro)Extraction Techniques to Characterise Harpagophytum procumbens Root and its Commercial Food Supplements
Nocentini, Alessio;Gratteri, Paola;
2018
Abstract
Introduction – For the determination of harpagoside and the wide phenolic pattern in Harpagophytum procumbens root and its commercial food supplements, dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction (DLLME), ultrasound-assisted DLLME (UA-DLLME), and sugaring-out liquid–liquid extraction (SULLE) were tested and compared. Objectives – In order to optimise the extraction efficiency, DLLME and UA-DLLMEwere performed in different solvents (water and aqueous solutions of glucose, β-cyclodextrin, (2-hydroxypropyl)-β-cyclodextrin, sodium chloride, natural deep eutectic solvent, and ionic liquid). Material andMethods – The plantmaterial was ground and sieved to obtain a uniformgranulometry before extraction. Commercial food supplements, containing H. procumbens are commercially available in Italy. Results – The most effective sodium chloride-aided-DLLME was then optimised and applied for analyses followed by HPLC-PDA. For comparison, microwave-assisted extraction was performed using the same solvents and the best results were obtained using 1% of β-cyclodextrin or 15% of sodium chloride. Conclusion – All commercial samples respected the European Pharmacopoeia monograph for this plant material, showing a harpagoside content ≥ 1.2%.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Diuzheva_et_al-2018-Phytochemical_Analysis.pdf
Accesso chiuso
Tipologia:
Pdf editoriale (Version of record)
Licenza:
Tutti i diritti riservati
Dimensione
388.53 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
388.53 kB | Adobe PDF | Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in FLORE sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.