Although stroboscopic pulse (SP) ground penetrat- ing radar (GPR) is the most popular and widespread equipment for subsoil investigation, continuous-wave (CW) radar has better performance in terms of noise, system dynamic range, and penetration depth, at the expense of greater complexity and cost of the components. The aim of this letter is a direct comparison between SP GPR and CW GPR through an extensive measurement campaign in five different locations representative of the different conditions where a GPR could operate.
Noise Performance Comparison Between Continuous Wave and Stroboscopic Pulse Ground Penetrating Radar / Massimiliano, Pieraccini. - In: IEEE GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING LETTERS. - ISSN 1545-598X. - ELETTRONICO. - 15:(2018), pp. 222-226. [10.1109/LGRS.2017.2781458]
Noise Performance Comparison Between Continuous Wave and Stroboscopic Pulse Ground Penetrating Radar
massimiliano pieraccini
2018
Abstract
Although stroboscopic pulse (SP) ground penetrat- ing radar (GPR) is the most popular and widespread equipment for subsoil investigation, continuous-wave (CW) radar has better performance in terms of noise, system dynamic range, and penetration depth, at the expense of greater complexity and cost of the components. The aim of this letter is a direct comparison between SP GPR and CW GPR through an extensive measurement campaign in five different locations representative of the different conditions where a GPR could operate.
| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
08239632.pdf
Accesso chiuso
Tipologia:
Versione finale referata (Postprint, Accepted manuscript)
Licenza:
Tutti i diritti riservati
Dimensione
1.65 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.65 MB | Adobe PDF | Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in FLORE sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
