Previous studies reported that enhanced recovery pathway (ERP) is safe in elderly who did not require a specifically tailored protocol. In previous studies, elderly have been considered as a homogeneous cohort and the cut-off value to identify them was different. The aim of the present study is to assess the compliance to ERP and its impact on postoperative outcome in three subgroups of elderly patients with increasing ages. Prospectively collected data entered in an electronic Italian registry specifically designed for ERP were reviewed. 315 elderly patients undergoing elective colorectal resection were divided into three groups. Group 1: 71-75 years (n = 105), Group 2: 76-80 years (n = 117), Group 3: over 80 years (n = 93). Primary endpoints of the study were adherence to ERP and time to readiness for discharge (TRD). Compliance to ERP was similar in the three groups. No difference among groups was found for mortality, overall morbidity, major complications, reoperation rate and readmission rate. Median TRD and length of hospital stay (LOS) were progressively longer with increasing age (p = 0.018 and p = 0.078, respectively). Increasing age did not impact on adherence to ERP and postoperative morbidity, but delayed both TRD and LOS.

Enhanced recovery pathway in elderly patients undergoing colorectal surgery: is there an effect of increasing ages? Results from the perioperative Italian Society Registry / Braga, Marco; Beretta, Luigi; Pecorelli, Nicolò; Maspero, Marianna; Casiraghi, Umberto; Borghi, Felice; Pellegrino, Luca; Bona, Stefano; Monzani, Roberta; Ferrari, Gianluigi; Radrizzani, Danilo; Iuliani, Riccardo; Bima, Carlo; Scatizzi, Marco; Missana, Giancarlo; Guicciardi, Marco Azzola; Muratore, Andrea; Crespi, Michele; Bouzari, Hedayat; Ceretti, Andrea Pisani; Ficari, Ferdinando. - In: UPDATES IN SURGERY. - ISSN 2038-131X. - ELETTRONICO. - 70:(2018), pp. 1-7. [10.1007/s13304-017-0474-4]

Enhanced recovery pathway in elderly patients undergoing colorectal surgery: is there an effect of increasing ages? Results from the perioperative Italian Society Registry

Ficari, Ferdinando
2018

Abstract

Previous studies reported that enhanced recovery pathway (ERP) is safe in elderly who did not require a specifically tailored protocol. In previous studies, elderly have been considered as a homogeneous cohort and the cut-off value to identify them was different. The aim of the present study is to assess the compliance to ERP and its impact on postoperative outcome in three subgroups of elderly patients with increasing ages. Prospectively collected data entered in an electronic Italian registry specifically designed for ERP were reviewed. 315 elderly patients undergoing elective colorectal resection were divided into three groups. Group 1: 71-75 years (n = 105), Group 2: 76-80 years (n = 117), Group 3: over 80 years (n = 93). Primary endpoints of the study were adherence to ERP and time to readiness for discharge (TRD). Compliance to ERP was similar in the three groups. No difference among groups was found for mortality, overall morbidity, major complications, reoperation rate and readmission rate. Median TRD and length of hospital stay (LOS) were progressively longer with increasing age (p = 0.018 and p = 0.078, respectively). Increasing age did not impact on adherence to ERP and postoperative morbidity, but delayed both TRD and LOS.
2018
70
1
7
Braga, Marco; Beretta, Luigi; Pecorelli, Nicolò; Maspero, Marianna; Casiraghi, Umberto; Borghi, Felice; Pellegrino, Luca; Bona, Stefano; Monzani, Robe...espandi
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Braga2018_Article_EnhancedRecoveryPathwayInElder.pdf

Accesso chiuso

Tipologia: Pdf editoriale (Version of record)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati
Dimensione 328.9 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
328.9 kB Adobe PDF   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in FLORE sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificatore per citare o creare un link a questa risorsa: https://hdl.handle.net/2158/1111006
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 8
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 8
social impact