This paper introduces the comparative performance analysis between ETSI SmartBAN and Bluetooth low energy (BLE) in the interfered additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN) channel as well as in multipath fading channel. Both technologies are possible solutions for wireless body area networks (WBAN) to implement services like delivering the vital signs data of an individual. The results show how the SmartBAN can outperform BLE in both AWGN and fading channel. In addition, SmartBAN can take advantages of repetition and coding features, which are not present in BLE to increase its performance even more.
Performance Comparison between ETSI SmartBAN and Bluetooth / Andrea D’Souza, Harri Viittala, Matti Hämäläinen, Lorenzo Mucchi. - STAMPA. - (2018), pp. 1-5. (Intervento presentato al convegno International symposium on medical ICT (ISMICT) tenutosi a Sydnet, Australia nel 26-28 Mar 2018).
Performance Comparison between ETSI SmartBAN and Bluetooth
D'SOUZA, ANDREA;Lorenzo Mucchi
2018
Abstract
This paper introduces the comparative performance analysis between ETSI SmartBAN and Bluetooth low energy (BLE) in the interfered additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN) channel as well as in multipath fading channel. Both technologies are possible solutions for wireless body area networks (WBAN) to implement services like delivering the vital signs data of an individual. The results show how the SmartBAN can outperform BLE in both AWGN and fading channel. In addition, SmartBAN can take advantages of repetition and coding features, which are not present in BLE to increase its performance even more.
| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
SmartBAN vs BT_final_revised.pdf
Accesso chiuso
Tipologia:
Versione finale referata (Postprint, Accepted manuscript)
Licenza:
Tutti i diritti riservati
Dimensione
1.2 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.2 MB | Adobe PDF | Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in FLORE sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
