The continuing depletion of fossil fuels and the growing restrictions for greenhouse emissions, leads to reprocess wasted heat generated by power plants. For this purpose, Combined Cycles Gas Turbine (CCGT) represent a strong technology to obtain, an increase of performances and competitive costs within global market. To design the CCGT configuration, energy engineering companies should define and analyze the performances of bottomer cycle, imposing operating parameters of steam turbine and heat recovery boiler. Usually, these plant components are supplied by different manufacturers so the plant could not be globally optimized. Considering a steam turbines manufacturer as GE Oil&Gas, a high level of components integration, is a chance to optimize globally the bottomer cycle, determining the best machine in terms of efficiency and improving plant productivity. This aim could be obtained through the development of a high level of combination between company simulation codes and energy balance codes. In this paper, a two-pressure level combined cycle is examined and optimized. The best thermoeconomic configuration is obtained: first, imposing steam turbine efficiency and using literature costs correlations; then, acquiring the efficiency by a steam turbine industrial tool and considering real machines costs. Therefore, two distinct best configurations could be determined and compared

Effect of a real steam turbine on thermoeconomic analysis of combined cycle power plants / Carcasci, Carlo; Cosi, Lorenzo; Ferraro, Riccardo; Pacifici, Beniamino*. - In: ENERGY. - ISSN 0360-5442. - STAMPA. - 138:(2017), pp. 32-47. [10.1016/j.energy.2017.07.048]

Effect of a real steam turbine on thermoeconomic analysis of combined cycle power plants

Carcasci, Carlo;Cosi, Lorenzo;Ferraro, Riccardo;
2017

Abstract

The continuing depletion of fossil fuels and the growing restrictions for greenhouse emissions, leads to reprocess wasted heat generated by power plants. For this purpose, Combined Cycles Gas Turbine (CCGT) represent a strong technology to obtain, an increase of performances and competitive costs within global market. To design the CCGT configuration, energy engineering companies should define and analyze the performances of bottomer cycle, imposing operating parameters of steam turbine and heat recovery boiler. Usually, these plant components are supplied by different manufacturers so the plant could not be globally optimized. Considering a steam turbines manufacturer as GE Oil&Gas, a high level of components integration, is a chance to optimize globally the bottomer cycle, determining the best machine in terms of efficiency and improving plant productivity. This aim could be obtained through the development of a high level of combination between company simulation codes and energy balance codes. In this paper, a two-pressure level combined cycle is examined and optimized. The best thermoeconomic configuration is obtained: first, imposing steam turbine efficiency and using literature costs correlations; then, acquiring the efficiency by a steam turbine industrial tool and considering real machines costs. Therefore, two distinct best configurations could be determined and compared
2017
138
32
47
Carcasci, Carlo; Cosi, Lorenzo; Ferraro, Riccardo; Pacifici, Beniamino*
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
91_17_Energy_CCGT_Economic_2PressureLevel_Pacifici.pdf

Accesso chiuso

Descrizione: PDF editoriale
Tipologia: Pdf editoriale (Version of record)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati
Dimensione 1.58 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.58 MB Adobe PDF   Richiedi una copia
EffectOfRealSteamTurbine_03_Sent.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: Draft della versione definitiva
Tipologia: Versione finale referata (Postprint, Accepted manuscript)
Licenza: Open Access
Dimensione 1.48 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.48 MB Adobe PDF

I documenti in FLORE sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificatore per citare o creare un link a questa risorsa: https://hdl.handle.net/2158/1121747
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 28
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 25
social impact