The efficiency of CO2 uptake by the amines 2-(2-aminoethoxy)ethanol (DGA), 2-amino-2-methyl-1,3-propanediol (AMPD), 2-amino-2-methyl-1-propanol (AMP), 2,2′-iminodiethanol (DEA) and 2-(butylamino)ethanol (BUMEA) has been investigated either in aqueous and in 2-(2-methoxyethoxy)ethanol (DEGMME) solutions and compared with 30% aqueous 2-aminoethanol (MEA). Batch experiments were carried out to measure the CO2 loading capacity of the different amine solutions and the rate of CO2 absorption. The 13C analysis has been applied to identify and quantify the carbonated species in solution upon CO2 uptake. The efficiency of CO2 (15% in air) capture was measured in continuous cycles of absorption (40 °C) and desorption (110 °C) carried out in packed columns at room pressure. The efficiency of the aqueous absorbents is greater than 90% and overcomes that in 2-(2-methoxyethoxy)ethanol. The CO2 absorption heat of aqueous BUMEA and DGA in DEGMME calculated using Gibbs–Helmholtz equation was found to be lower than that of conventional 30% aqueous MEA: the possible advantages of these systems with respect to aqueous MEA as CO2 absorbents have been discussed.
Reversible carbon dioxide capture by aqueous and non-aqueous amine-based absorbents: A comparative analysis carried out by 13C NMR spectroscopy / Barzagli, Francesco; Giorgi, Claudia; Mani, Fabrizio; Peruzzini, Maurizio. - In: APPLIED ENERGY. - ISSN 0306-2619. - STAMPA. - 220:(2018), pp. 208-219. [10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.03.076]
Reversible carbon dioxide capture by aqueous and non-aqueous amine-based absorbents: A comparative analysis carried out by 13C NMR spectroscopy
Barzagli, Francesco
;Giorgi, Claudia;Mani, Fabrizio;Peruzzini, Maurizio
2018
Abstract
The efficiency of CO2 uptake by the amines 2-(2-aminoethoxy)ethanol (DGA), 2-amino-2-methyl-1,3-propanediol (AMPD), 2-amino-2-methyl-1-propanol (AMP), 2,2′-iminodiethanol (DEA) and 2-(butylamino)ethanol (BUMEA) has been investigated either in aqueous and in 2-(2-methoxyethoxy)ethanol (DEGMME) solutions and compared with 30% aqueous 2-aminoethanol (MEA). Batch experiments were carried out to measure the CO2 loading capacity of the different amine solutions and the rate of CO2 absorption. The 13C analysis has been applied to identify and quantify the carbonated species in solution upon CO2 uptake. The efficiency of CO2 (15% in air) capture was measured in continuous cycles of absorption (40 °C) and desorption (110 °C) carried out in packed columns at room pressure. The efficiency of the aqueous absorbents is greater than 90% and overcomes that in 2-(2-methoxyethoxy)ethanol. The CO2 absorption heat of aqueous BUMEA and DGA in DEGMME calculated using Gibbs–Helmholtz equation was found to be lower than that of conventional 30% aqueous MEA: the possible advantages of these systems with respect to aqueous MEA as CO2 absorbents have been discussed.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
reversible carbon dioxide.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Pdf editoriale (Version of record)
Licenza:
Open Access
Dimensione
684.65 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
684.65 kB | Adobe PDF | |
applied_energy.pdf
Accesso chiuso
Tipologia:
Pdf editoriale (Version of record)
Licenza:
Tutti i diritti riservati
Dimensione
1.76 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.76 MB | Adobe PDF | Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in FLORE sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.