In order to accurately assess air pollution risks, health studies require spatially resolved pollution concentrations. Land-use regression (LUR) models estimate ambient concentrations at a fine spatial scale. However, spatial effects such as spatial non-stationarity and spatial autocorrelation can reduce the accuracy of LUR estimates by increasing regression errors and uncertainty; and statistical methods for resolving these effects – e.g., spatially autoregressive (SAR) and geographically weighted regression (GWR) models – may be difficult to apply simultaneously. We used an alternate approach to address spatial non-stationarity and spatial autocorrelation in LUR models for nitrogen dioxide. Traditional models were re-specified to include a variable capturing wind speed and direction, and re-fit as GWR models. Mean R2 values for the resulting GWR-wind models (summer: 0.86, winter: 0.73) showed a 10–20% improvement over traditional LUR models. GWR-wind models effectively addressed both spatial effects and produced meaningful predictive models. These results suggest a useful method for improving spatially explicit models.

Accounting for spatial effects in land use regression for urban air pollution modeling / Bertazzon, Stefania*; Johnson, Markey; Eccles, Kristin; Kaplan, Gilaad G.. - In: SPATIAL AND SPATIO-TEMPORAL EPIDEMIOLOGY. - ISSN 1877-5845. - STAMPA. - 14-15:(2015), pp. 9-21. [10.1016/j.sste.2015.06.002]

Accounting for spatial effects in land use regression for urban air pollution modeling

Bertazzon, Stefania
;
2015

Abstract

In order to accurately assess air pollution risks, health studies require spatially resolved pollution concentrations. Land-use regression (LUR) models estimate ambient concentrations at a fine spatial scale. However, spatial effects such as spatial non-stationarity and spatial autocorrelation can reduce the accuracy of LUR estimates by increasing regression errors and uncertainty; and statistical methods for resolving these effects – e.g., spatially autoregressive (SAR) and geographically weighted regression (GWR) models – may be difficult to apply simultaneously. We used an alternate approach to address spatial non-stationarity and spatial autocorrelation in LUR models for nitrogen dioxide. Traditional models were re-specified to include a variable capturing wind speed and direction, and re-fit as GWR models. Mean R2 values for the resulting GWR-wind models (summer: 0.86, winter: 0.73) showed a 10–20% improvement over traditional LUR models. GWR-wind models effectively addressed both spatial effects and produced meaningful predictive models. These results suggest a useful method for improving spatially explicit models.
2015
14-15
9
21
Bertazzon, Stefania*; Johnson, Markey; Eccles, Kristin; Kaplan, Gilaad G.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
LUR-NO2.pdf

Accesso chiuso

Tipologia: Pdf editoriale (Version of record)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati
Dimensione 2.3 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.3 MB Adobe PDF   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in FLORE sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificatore per citare o creare un link a questa risorsa: https://hdl.handle.net/2158/1124816
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 72
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 66
social impact