Purpose. Broad methodological heterogeneity makes the literature on the clinical effects of laser treatment in periodontitis, both as monotherapy or adjunct to non-surgical therapy, difficult to interpret. The present split-mouth study was performed: i) to determine the efficacy and safety of a photoablative-photodynamic diode laser therapy, including antiseptic LED irradiation, in adjunct to scaling and root planing (iPAPD+SRP) vs. sham-treatment+SRP for the treatment of diffuse severe periodontitis; ii) to estimate the patient–reported outcomes. Methods. Twenty-four patients with severe periodontitis were treated with iPAPD+SRP or sham-treatment+SRP. iPAPD+SRP consisted of: 1) intra/extra-pocket de-epithelization with photoablative λ 810 nm laser; 2) disinfection with λ 405 nm LED; 3) SRP; 4) 10 weekly antiseptic/anti-inflammatory photodynamic treatments with λ 635 nm laser and 0.1% toluidine blue as photosensitizer. Clinical and cytofluorescent periodontal markers and patient-reported results were analyzed. Results. At 1-year follow-up, both groups showed a significant reduction of several severity markers of periodontitis, namely probing depth (PD) and bleeding on probing (BoP), as well as of bacteria, polymorphonuclear cells, erythrocytes and damaged epithelial cells in exfoliative samples, as compared with day 0. The quadrants subjected to iPAPD+SRP showed significantly better values of these parameters as well as of clinical attachment level (CAL) as compared with those undergoing sham-treatment+SRP. The patients’ perceived pain/discomfort and overall liking was also in favor of the iPAPD+SRP treatment. Conclusions. This study confirms the efficacy of combined phototherapy in adjunct to SRP which had emerged from previous clinical trials, extending its field of application to severe periodontitis
Treatment of severe periodontitis with a laser and light-emitting diode (LED) procedure adjunctive to scaling and root planing: a double-blind, randomized, single-center, split-mouth clinical trial investigating its efficacy and patient-reported outcomes at 1 year / Giannelli, Marco*; Materassi, Fabrizio; Fossi, Tiziana; Lorenzini, Luca; Bani, Daniele. - In: LASERS IN MEDICAL SCIENCE. - ISSN 0268-8921. - STAMPA. - 33:(2018), pp. 991-1002. [10.1007/s10103-018-2441-9]
Treatment of severe periodontitis with a laser and light-emitting diode (LED) procedure adjunctive to scaling and root planing: a double-blind, randomized, single-center, split-mouth clinical trial investigating its efficacy and patient-reported outcomes at 1 year
Bani, DanieleWriting – Review & Editing
2018
Abstract
Purpose. Broad methodological heterogeneity makes the literature on the clinical effects of laser treatment in periodontitis, both as monotherapy or adjunct to non-surgical therapy, difficult to interpret. The present split-mouth study was performed: i) to determine the efficacy and safety of a photoablative-photodynamic diode laser therapy, including antiseptic LED irradiation, in adjunct to scaling and root planing (iPAPD+SRP) vs. sham-treatment+SRP for the treatment of diffuse severe periodontitis; ii) to estimate the patient–reported outcomes. Methods. Twenty-four patients with severe periodontitis were treated with iPAPD+SRP or sham-treatment+SRP. iPAPD+SRP consisted of: 1) intra/extra-pocket de-epithelization with photoablative λ 810 nm laser; 2) disinfection with λ 405 nm LED; 3) SRP; 4) 10 weekly antiseptic/anti-inflammatory photodynamic treatments with λ 635 nm laser and 0.1% toluidine blue as photosensitizer. Clinical and cytofluorescent periodontal markers and patient-reported results were analyzed. Results. At 1-year follow-up, both groups showed a significant reduction of several severity markers of periodontitis, namely probing depth (PD) and bleeding on probing (BoP), as well as of bacteria, polymorphonuclear cells, erythrocytes and damaged epithelial cells in exfoliative samples, as compared with day 0. The quadrants subjected to iPAPD+SRP showed significantly better values of these parameters as well as of clinical attachment level (CAL) as compared with those undergoing sham-treatment+SRP. The patients’ perceived pain/discomfort and overall liking was also in favor of the iPAPD+SRP treatment. Conclusions. This study confirms the efficacy of combined phototherapy in adjunct to SRP which had emerged from previous clinical trials, extending its field of application to severe periodontitis| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Giannelli et al LiMS 2018.pdf
Accesso chiuso
Descrizione: full text
Tipologia:
Pdf editoriale (Version of record)
Licenza:
Tutti i diritti riservati
Dimensione
969.03 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
969.03 kB | Adobe PDF | Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in FLORE sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.



