In this paper, we study networked systems in the presence of Denial-of-Service (DoS) attacks, namely attacks that prevent transmissions over the communication network. Previous studies have shown that co-located architectures (control unit co-located with the actuators and networked sensor channel) can ensure a high level of robustness against DoS. However, co-location requires a wired or dedicated actuator channel, which could not meet flexibility and cost requirements. In this paper we consider a control architecture that approximates co-location while enabling remote implementation (networked sensor and actuator channels). We analyze closed-loop stability and quantify the robustness “gap” between this architecture and the co-located one.
Networked Systems under Denial-of-Service: Co-located vs. Remote Control Architectures / Feng, Shuai; Tesi, Pietro. - STAMPA. - 50:(2017), pp. 2627-2632. (Intervento presentato al convegno 20th IFAC World Congress) [10.1016/j.ifacol.2017.08.139].
Networked Systems under Denial-of-Service: Co-located vs. Remote Control Architectures
Tesi, Pietro
2017
Abstract
In this paper, we study networked systems in the presence of Denial-of-Service (DoS) attacks, namely attacks that prevent transmissions over the communication network. Previous studies have shown that co-located architectures (control unit co-located with the actuators and networked sensor channel) can ensure a high level of robustness against DoS. However, co-location requires a wired or dedicated actuator channel, which could not meet flexibility and cost requirements. In this paper we consider a control architecture that approximates co-location while enabling remote implementation (networked sensor and actuator channels). We analyze closed-loop stability and quantify the robustness “gap” between this architecture and the co-located one.I documenti in FLORE sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.