The paper presents a new comprehensive study of PHerc. 1067. In addition to illustrating the main features of the roll, gathered from its virtual reconstruction, the article discusses the script and the bibliological parameters which characterize the roll, in an attempt to analyze its mise en page, in the light of other recent studies concerning the layout of ancient Roman book-rolls. In its third and main part, the paper contains a critical edition of the entire papyrus, and discusses a proposal for a new attribution of the text. Challenging the previous attribution of the text to L. Manlius Torquatus and its interpretation as a oratio in Senatu habita ante principem, the palaeographic evidence from the final subscriptio shows that that work was certainly written by a L. Annaeus Seneca. The nature of the text – characterized by a clear predominance of historical and political matter attributable to the first decades of the Roman Empire – suggests Seneca the Elder as the most probable hypothesis for the author of the text. Moreover, elements internal to the text and the tiny traces of ink preserved in the second line of the subscriptio seem to fit the historical work composed by Seneca, rather than the rhetorical one.

Il P.Herc. 1067 latino: il rotolo, il testo, l’autore / Valeria Piano. - In: CRONACHE ERCOLANESI. - ISSN 0391-1535. - STAMPA. - 47:(2017), pp. 163-250.

Il P.Herc. 1067 latino: il rotolo, il testo, l’autore

Valeria Piano
2017

Abstract

The paper presents a new comprehensive study of PHerc. 1067. In addition to illustrating the main features of the roll, gathered from its virtual reconstruction, the article discusses the script and the bibliological parameters which characterize the roll, in an attempt to analyze its mise en page, in the light of other recent studies concerning the layout of ancient Roman book-rolls. In its third and main part, the paper contains a critical edition of the entire papyrus, and discusses a proposal for a new attribution of the text. Challenging the previous attribution of the text to L. Manlius Torquatus and its interpretation as a oratio in Senatu habita ante principem, the palaeographic evidence from the final subscriptio shows that that work was certainly written by a L. Annaeus Seneca. The nature of the text – characterized by a clear predominance of historical and political matter attributable to the first decades of the Roman Empire – suggests Seneca the Elder as the most probable hypothesis for the author of the text. Moreover, elements internal to the text and the tiny traces of ink preserved in the second line of the subscriptio seem to fit the historical work composed by Seneca, rather than the rhetorical one.
2017
47
163
250
Goal 4: Quality education
Valeria Piano
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
14_PIANO_PHerc 1067_CErc 47-2017.pdf

Accesso chiuso

Tipologia: Pdf editoriale (Version of record)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati
Dimensione 23.81 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
23.81 MB Adobe PDF   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in FLORE sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificatore per citare o creare un link a questa risorsa: https://hdl.handle.net/2158/1143838
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact