After briefly reconstructing the debate concerning care and justice, this paper highlights the difference between liberal ontology and epistemology and the epistemic and ontological assumptions of care ethics. It explores the importance of social epistemology and epistemic injustice for care ethics and links care ethics to an ecological and horizontal epistemology. It justifies forgoing the construction of a systematic theory of justice à la Rawls, endorses an idea of justice that gives priority to injustice, and sees democracy as a pre-condition for a caring society.
Care and Injustice / Brunella Casalini. - In: INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARE AND CARING. - ISSN 2397-8821. - STAMPA. - 4:(2020), pp. 59-73. [https://doi.org/10.1332/239788219X15730452949174]
Care and Injustice
Brunella Casalini
2020
Abstract
After briefly reconstructing the debate concerning care and justice, this paper highlights the difference between liberal ontology and epistemology and the epistemic and ontological assumptions of care ethics. It explores the importance of social epistemology and epistemic injustice for care ethics and links care ethics to an ecological and horizontal epistemology. It justifies forgoing the construction of a systematic theory of justice à la Rawls, endorses an idea of justice that gives priority to injustice, and sees democracy as a pre-condition for a caring society.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
ijcc-ft-casalini-uploaded_131219_1576218746217.pdf
Accesso chiuso
Tipologia:
Pdf editoriale (Version of record)
Licenza:
Tutti i diritti riservati
Dimensione
183.68 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
183.68 kB | Adobe PDF | Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in FLORE sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.