In many familiar European languages, e.g. German or Italian, possessive pronouns agree in φ-features with their head noun. We argue that they are genitive pronouns, endowed with an extra φ-features set. As such, they are part of a range of phenomena including case stacking and linkers uni-fied under the historical-typological label of Suffixaufnahme. We express the formal basis for this unification as the Stacking Generalization (sec-tion 1). We then apply our analysis to the narrower domain of facts in-volving possessive pronouns, specifically in Balkan and Romance lan-guages. We further find that 1/2P pronouns present a richer stacking structure than their 3P counterparts (section 2). We examine this latter fact in the context of a more general phenomenon, whereby the 1/2P vs 3P Person split not only tends to correlate with different case and agreement alignments – but seems to govern the morphological expression of case and agreement itself, in terms of richer vs poorer content (section 3).
Possessive pronouns as oblique DPs: Linkers and affix stacking / M. Rita Manzini. - In: JEZIKOSLOVLJE. - ISSN 1331-7202. - STAMPA. - (2018), pp. 1-33.
Possessive pronouns as oblique DPs: Linkers and affix stacking
M. Rita Manzini
2018
Abstract
In many familiar European languages, e.g. German or Italian, possessive pronouns agree in φ-features with their head noun. We argue that they are genitive pronouns, endowed with an extra φ-features set. As such, they are part of a range of phenomena including case stacking and linkers uni-fied under the historical-typological label of Suffixaufnahme. We express the formal basis for this unification as the Stacking Generalization (sec-tion 1). We then apply our analysis to the narrower domain of facts in-volving possessive pronouns, specifically in Balkan and Romance lan-guages. We further find that 1/2P pronouns present a richer stacking structure than their 3P counterparts (section 2). We examine this latter fact in the context of a more general phenomenon, whereby the 1/2P vs 3P Person split not only tends to correlate with different case and agreement alignments – but seems to govern the morphological expression of case and agreement itself, in terms of richer vs poorer content (section 3).File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Manzini_Jezikoslovlje.Typesetting_author.pdf
Accesso chiuso
Tipologia:
Pdf editoriale (Version of record)
Licenza:
Tutti i diritti riservati
Dimensione
617.59 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
617.59 kB | Adobe PDF | Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in FLORE sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.