BACKGROUND: The increasing frequency in the diagnosis of thyroid nodules has raised a growing interest in the search for new diagnostic tools to better select patients deserving surgery. In 2014, the major Italian Societies involved in the field drafted a new cytological classification, to better stratify pre-surgical risk of thyroid cancer, especially for the indeterminate category, split into TIR3A and TIR3B subclasses, associated to different therapeutic decisions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective cross-sectional survey analyzed thyroid fine-needle aspiration biopsy performed at our outpatient clinic before and after the introduction of the new SIAPEC-IAP consensus in May 2014. RESULTS: 8956 thyroid nodules were included in the analysis: 5692 were evaluated according to the old classification and 3264 according to the new one. The new criteria caused the overall prevalence of TIR3 to increase from 6.1 to 20.1%. Of those, 10.7 and 9.4% were included in the TIR3A and TIR3B subgroups, respectively. Each of the 213 TIR3B nodules underwent surgery and 86 (40.4%) were diagnosed as thyroid cancer, while among the 349 TIR3A nodules, only 15 of the 60 that underwent surgery were found to be thyroid cancer. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis shows that the new SIAPEC-IAC criteria significantly increased the proportion of the overall TIR3 diagnosis. The division of TIR3 nodules into two subgroups (A and B) allowed a better evaluation of the oncologic risk and a better selection of patients to be referred to surgery.

Clinical impact of the new SIAPEC-IAP classification on the indeterminate category of thyroid nodules / Sparano, C.; Parenti, G.; Cilotti, A.; Bencini, L.; Calistri, M.; Mannucci, E.; Biagini, C.; Vezzosi, V.; Mannelli, M.; Forti, G.; Petrone, L.*. - In: JOURNAL OF ENDOCRINOLOGICAL INVESTIGATION. - ISSN 0391-4097. - STAMPA. - 42:(2018), pp. 1-6. [10.1007/s40618-018-0871-7]

Clinical impact of the new SIAPEC-IAP classification on the indeterminate category of thyroid nodules

SPARANO, CLOTILDE;Parenti, G.;Cilotti, A.;Mannucci, E.;Vezzosi, V.;Mannelli, M.;Forti, G.;Petrone, Lorenzo
2018

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The increasing frequency in the diagnosis of thyroid nodules has raised a growing interest in the search for new diagnostic tools to better select patients deserving surgery. In 2014, the major Italian Societies involved in the field drafted a new cytological classification, to better stratify pre-surgical risk of thyroid cancer, especially for the indeterminate category, split into TIR3A and TIR3B subclasses, associated to different therapeutic decisions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective cross-sectional survey analyzed thyroid fine-needle aspiration biopsy performed at our outpatient clinic before and after the introduction of the new SIAPEC-IAP consensus in May 2014. RESULTS: 8956 thyroid nodules were included in the analysis: 5692 were evaluated according to the old classification and 3264 according to the new one. The new criteria caused the overall prevalence of TIR3 to increase from 6.1 to 20.1%. Of those, 10.7 and 9.4% were included in the TIR3A and TIR3B subgroups, respectively. Each of the 213 TIR3B nodules underwent surgery and 86 (40.4%) were diagnosed as thyroid cancer, while among the 349 TIR3A nodules, only 15 of the 60 that underwent surgery were found to be thyroid cancer. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis shows that the new SIAPEC-IAC criteria significantly increased the proportion of the overall TIR3 diagnosis. The division of TIR3 nodules into two subgroups (A and B) allowed a better evaluation of the oncologic risk and a better selection of patients to be referred to surgery.
2018
42
1
6
Sparano, C.; Parenti, G.; Cilotti, A.; Bencini, L.; Calistri, M.; Mannucci, E.; Biagini, C.; Vezzosi, V.; Mannelli, M.; Forti, G.; Petrone, L.*
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in FLORE sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificatore per citare o creare un link a questa risorsa: https://hdl.handle.net/2158/1146217
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 16
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 16
social impact