Derk Pereboom argues for a source incompatibilist view of moral responsability. His “manipulation argument” employs a generalization strategy aimed to point out the continuity of our intuitions between cases where the agent is induced by “external forces” to make some choice and the normal condition where human agents’ behaviour is governed by universal determinism. This paper tries to show that Pereboom’s strategy is flawed and there are relevant moral differences between manipulation and determination.

Fuori controllo. Responsabilità morale, manipolazione e determinismo in Derk Pereboom / Matteo Galletti. - In: NOTIZIE DI POLITEIA. - ISSN 1128-2401. - STAMPA. - 33:(2017), pp. 138-151.

Fuori controllo. Responsabilità morale, manipolazione e determinismo in Derk Pereboom

Matteo Galletti
2017

Abstract

Derk Pereboom argues for a source incompatibilist view of moral responsability. His “manipulation argument” employs a generalization strategy aimed to point out the continuity of our intuitions between cases where the agent is induced by “external forces” to make some choice and the normal condition where human agents’ behaviour is governed by universal determinism. This paper tries to show that Pereboom’s strategy is flawed and there are relevant moral differences between manipulation and determination.
2017
33
138
151
Matteo Galletti
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in FLORE sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificatore per citare o creare un link a questa risorsa: https://hdl.handle.net/2158/1147175
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact