The validity of a right not to know personal genetic information has been both questioned and defended on the basis of two different understandings of «personal autonomy». The paper tries to show that a proposal to ground this right on a notion of «privacy» is, morally speaking, successful but, if correctly integrated with a reference to personal identity, it’s complementary (and not really alternative) to a «thick» view of personal autonomy. An identity-based approach can also shed a different light on the nature and limits of a moral duty to communicate genetic information to family members.
Tensioni di identità. Autonomia, privacy e dilemmi morali in genetica / Matteo Galletti. - In: RAGION PRATICA. - ISSN 1720-2396. - STAMPA. - (2015), pp. 511-528.
Tensioni di identità. Autonomia, privacy e dilemmi morali in genetica
Matteo Galletti
2015
Abstract
The validity of a right not to know personal genetic information has been both questioned and defended on the basis of two different understandings of «personal autonomy». The paper tries to show that a proposal to ground this right on a notion of «privacy» is, morally speaking, successful but, if correctly integrated with a reference to personal identity, it’s complementary (and not really alternative) to a «thick» view of personal autonomy. An identity-based approach can also shed a different light on the nature and limits of a moral duty to communicate genetic information to family members.I documenti in FLORE sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.