The validity of a right not to know personal genetic information has been both questioned and defended on the basis of two different understandings of «personal autonomy». The paper tries to show that a proposal to ground this right on a notion of «privacy» is, morally speaking, successful but, if correctly integrated with a reference to personal identity, it’s complementary (and not really alternative) to a «thick» view of personal autonomy. An identity-based approach can also shed a different light on the nature and limits of a moral duty to communicate genetic information to family members.

Tensioni di identità. Autonomia, privacy e dilemmi morali in genetica / Matteo Galletti. - In: RAGION PRATICA. - ISSN 1720-2396. - STAMPA. - (2015), pp. 511-528.

Tensioni di identità. Autonomia, privacy e dilemmi morali in genetica

Matteo Galletti
2015

Abstract

The validity of a right not to know personal genetic information has been both questioned and defended on the basis of two different understandings of «personal autonomy». The paper tries to show that a proposal to ground this right on a notion of «privacy» is, morally speaking, successful but, if correctly integrated with a reference to personal identity, it’s complementary (and not really alternative) to a «thick» view of personal autonomy. An identity-based approach can also shed a different light on the nature and limits of a moral duty to communicate genetic information to family members.
2015
511
528
Matteo Galletti
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in FLORE sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificatore per citare o creare un link a questa risorsa: https://hdl.handle.net/2158/1147321
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact