AIM: Treatment of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) imposes great challenges, due to a lack of molecular targets. While use of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogs has been validated in ER-positive breast cancer, this option has not been investigated in TNBC, even though a significant portion of these tumors upregulate GnRH receptors. We performed a meta-analysis of the literature to evaluate the effect of GnRH analogs in TNBC. METHODS: Four studies were included in this study. RESULTS: We detected a non-significant improvement in overall survival with GnRH analogs, while progression-free survival was unchanged. DISCUSSION: The majority of the trials evaluated in this analysis were designed to test efficacy of GnRH analogs in preventing premature ovarian failure. This may represent a limitation of our study as these trials were not specifically designed to detect differences in survival outcome measures. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that GnRH analogs may be useful as a targeted therapy in TNBC. Randomized prospective clinical trials are needed to investigate this hypothesis in the clinic.
Could gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogs be helpful in the treatment of triple-negative breast cancer? / Corona, Silvia Paola; Roviello, Giandomenico; Strina, Carla; Milani, Manuela; Allevi, Giovanni; Aguggini, Sergio; Zanoni, Daniele; Generali, Daniele. - In: FUTURE ONCOLOGY. - ISSN 1479-6694. - 13:(2017), pp. 2473-2477. [10.2217/fon-2017-0272]
Could gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogs be helpful in the treatment of triple-negative breast cancer?
Roviello, Giandomenico;
2017
Abstract
AIM: Treatment of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) imposes great challenges, due to a lack of molecular targets. While use of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogs has been validated in ER-positive breast cancer, this option has not been investigated in TNBC, even though a significant portion of these tumors upregulate GnRH receptors. We performed a meta-analysis of the literature to evaluate the effect of GnRH analogs in TNBC. METHODS: Four studies were included in this study. RESULTS: We detected a non-significant improvement in overall survival with GnRH analogs, while progression-free survival was unchanged. DISCUSSION: The majority of the trials evaluated in this analysis were designed to test efficacy of GnRH analogs in preventing premature ovarian failure. This may represent a limitation of our study as these trials were not specifically designed to detect differences in survival outcome measures. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that GnRH analogs may be useful as a targeted therapy in TNBC. Randomized prospective clinical trials are needed to investigate this hypothesis in the clinic.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Future oncology 27.pdf
Accesso chiuso
Dimensione
2.39 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
2.39 MB | Adobe PDF | Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in FLORE sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.



