The impact of ischemic damage on kidney function residual to partial nephrectomy (PN) remains a controversial issue. The clamping of the artery is more frequent during minimally invasive PN compared with the open counterpart. The CLOCK study (CLamp vs Off Clamp the Kidney during partial nephrectomy, clinicaltrial.gov registration n° NCT02287987) is a perspective, randomized, multicentre trial, started in September 2014, still recruiting, with the goal of 200 patients, to compare renal function preservation after robotic partial nephrectomy (RAPN). Local ethical committee approval was obtained by every center. Here an ″ad interim″ intention-to-treat analysis of the perioperative morbidity of the two procedures is reported.

MP49-02 PERIOPERATIVE MORBIDITY OF CLAMP VS OFF-CLAMP ROBOTIC PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY: PRELIMINARY RESULTS FROM A MULTICENTRE RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIAL (THE CLOCK STUDY) / Antonelli, Alessandro; Cindolo, Luca; Sandri, Marco; Furlan, Maria; Veccia, Alessandro; Palumbo, Carlotta; Simeone, Claudio; Sessa, Francesco; Facchiano, Davide; Serni, Sergio; Carini, Marco; De Concilio, Bernardino; Zeccolini, Guglielmo; Celia, Antonio; Ingrosso, Manuela; Giommoni, Valentina; Annino, Filippo; Pizzuti, Valerio; Nucciotti, Roberto; Dandrea, Matteo; Porreca, Angelo; Minervini, Andrea. - In: THE JOURNAL OF UROLOGY. - ISSN 0022-5347. - ELETTRONICO. - 197:(2017), pp. 0-0. [10.1016/j.juro.2017.02.1504]

MP49-02 PERIOPERATIVE MORBIDITY OF CLAMP VS OFF-CLAMP ROBOTIC PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY: PRELIMINARY RESULTS FROM A MULTICENTRE RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIAL (THE CLOCK STUDY)

Sessa, Francesco;Facchiano, Davide;Serni, Sergio;Carini, Marco;Minervini, Andrea
2017

Abstract

The impact of ischemic damage on kidney function residual to partial nephrectomy (PN) remains a controversial issue. The clamping of the artery is more frequent during minimally invasive PN compared with the open counterpart. The CLOCK study (CLamp vs Off Clamp the Kidney during partial nephrectomy, clinicaltrial.gov registration n° NCT02287987) is a perspective, randomized, multicentre trial, started in September 2014, still recruiting, with the goal of 200 patients, to compare renal function preservation after robotic partial nephrectomy (RAPN). Local ethical committee approval was obtained by every center. Here an ″ad interim″ intention-to-treat analysis of the perioperative morbidity of the two procedures is reported.
2017
Antonelli, Alessandro; Cindolo, Luca; Sandri, Marco; Furlan, Maria; Veccia, Alessandro; Palumbo, Carlotta; Simeone, Claudio; Sessa, Francesco; Facchiano, Davide; Serni, Sergio; Carini, Marco; De Concilio, Bernardino; Zeccolini, Guglielmo; Celia, Antonio; Ingrosso, Manuela; Giommoni, Valentina; Annino, Filippo; Pizzuti, Valerio; Nucciotti, Roberto; Dandrea, Matteo; Porreca, Angelo; Minervini, Andrea
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
j.juro.2017.02.1504.pdf

Accesso chiuso

Tipologia: Pdf editoriale (Version of record)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati
Dimensione 442.41 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
442.41 kB Adobe PDF   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in FLORE sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificatore per citare o creare un link a questa risorsa: https://hdl.handle.net/2158/1157068
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 4
social impact