This paper aims to answer to what extent fertility has a causal effect on households’ economic wellbeing - an issue that has received considerable interest in development studies and policy analysis. However, only recently has the literature begun to give importance to adequate modelling for estimation of causal effects. We discuss several strategies for causal inference, stressing that their validity must be judged on the assumptions we can plausibly formulate in a given application, which in turn depends on the richness of available data. This discussion has a general importance, representing a set of guidelines that can be helpful to choose the appropriate strategy of analysis. We contrast methods relying on the Unconfoundedness Assumption, which include regressions and propensity score matching, with Instrumental Variable methods. We discuss why they give different estimates of the causal effect using data from the Vietnam Living Standard measurement Survey.

Estimating the causal effect of fertility on economic wellbeing: data requirements, identifying assumptions and estimation methods / Arpino Bruno; Aassve Arnstein. - In: EMPIRICAL ECONOMICS. - ISSN 0377-7332. - 44:(2013), pp. 355-385. [10.1007/s00181-010-0356-9]

Estimating the causal effect of fertility on economic wellbeing: data requirements, identifying assumptions and estimation methods

Arpino Bruno;AASSVE, ARNSTEIN
2013

Abstract

This paper aims to answer to what extent fertility has a causal effect on households’ economic wellbeing - an issue that has received considerable interest in development studies and policy analysis. However, only recently has the literature begun to give importance to adequate modelling for estimation of causal effects. We discuss several strategies for causal inference, stressing that their validity must be judged on the assumptions we can plausibly formulate in a given application, which in turn depends on the richness of available data. This discussion has a general importance, representing a set of guidelines that can be helpful to choose the appropriate strategy of analysis. We contrast methods relying on the Unconfoundedness Assumption, which include regressions and propensity score matching, with Instrumental Variable methods. We discuss why they give different estimates of the causal effect using data from the Vietnam Living Standard measurement Survey.
2013
44
355
385
Arpino Bruno; Aassve Arnstein
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in FLORE sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificatore per citare o creare un link a questa risorsa: https://hdl.handle.net/2158/1161473
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 18
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 13
social impact