A comparison between transcriptomic responses to puffing disorder and Huanglongbing disease was conducted to decipher differences and similarities in gene and pathway regulation induced by abiotic (puffing) and biotic stresses (Huanglongbing) in citrus peel tissues. We functionally analyzed two previously published datasets: the first obtained for the study of puffing disorder using an Affymetrix citrus microarray and the second consisting of a deep sequencing analysis of symptomatic responses to Huanglongbing disease.

Stress responses in citrus peel: Comparative analysis of host responses to Huanglongbing disease and puffing disorder / MARTINELLI, Federico; Ibanez, A. M; Reagan, R. L; DAVINO, Salvatore; Dandekar, A. M.. - In: SCIENTIA HORTICULTURAE. - ISSN 0304-4238. - STAMPA. - (2015), pp. 409-420. [10.1016/j.scienta.2015.06.037]

Stress responses in citrus peel: Comparative analysis of host responses to Huanglongbing disease and puffing disorder

MARTINELLI, Federico;
2015

Abstract

A comparison between transcriptomic responses to puffing disorder and Huanglongbing disease was conducted to decipher differences and similarities in gene and pathway regulation induced by abiotic (puffing) and biotic stresses (Huanglongbing) in citrus peel tissues. We functionally analyzed two previously published datasets: the first obtained for the study of puffing disorder using an Affymetrix citrus microarray and the second consisting of a deep sequencing analysis of symptomatic responses to Huanglongbing disease.
2015
409
420
MARTINELLI, Federico; Ibanez, A. M; Reagan, R. L; DAVINO, Salvatore; Dandekar, A. M.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Martinelli et al. 2015.pdf

Accesso chiuso

Dimensione 2.21 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.21 MB Adobe PDF   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in FLORE sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificatore per citare o creare un link a questa risorsa: https://hdl.handle.net/2158/1165494
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 35
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 30
social impact