Heart failure (HF) with mid-range ejection fraction (HFmrEF) has been conceptualized by the European Society of Cardiology guidelines with the aim of stimulating research to fill a gap in knowledge: whether such a condition exists as a distinct pathophysiological and clinical entity, or it is just a residual category of ejection fraction indeed is still a matter of debate. Current evidence suggests that HFmrEF represents up to one fifth of patients with HF, who may ultimately result in an intermediate clinical phenotype, as for age and gender, with an intermediate prevalence of comorbidities. Nevertheless, a strong connection exists with HF with reduced ejection fraction, since ischemic aetiology is common in both categories, conveying relevant implications for prognosis and therapeutic response. Little is known about its pathophysiology: mild systolic impairment may be not enough and advocating diastolic dysfunction may be an oversimplification. An increasing amount of data is clarifying how many of HFmrEF patients are the results of deteriorating or recovering hearts, thus underscoring that aetiology may be, more than EF, the key to understand this new category. Sparse evidence points toward a potential benefit of common HF therapies in those patients, but further research is still needed. © Copyright R. Martone et al., 2019.

Heart failure with mid-range ejection fraction: Current evidence and uncertainties / Martone R.; Marchionni N.; Cappelli F.. - In: MONALDI ARCHIVES FOR CHEST DISEASE. - ISSN 1122-0643. - ELETTRONICO. - 89:(2019), pp. 63-66. [10.4081/monaldi.2019.1024]

Heart failure with mid-range ejection fraction: Current evidence and uncertainties

Martone R.;Marchionni N.;Cappelli F.
2019

Abstract

Heart failure (HF) with mid-range ejection fraction (HFmrEF) has been conceptualized by the European Society of Cardiology guidelines with the aim of stimulating research to fill a gap in knowledge: whether such a condition exists as a distinct pathophysiological and clinical entity, or it is just a residual category of ejection fraction indeed is still a matter of debate. Current evidence suggests that HFmrEF represents up to one fifth of patients with HF, who may ultimately result in an intermediate clinical phenotype, as for age and gender, with an intermediate prevalence of comorbidities. Nevertheless, a strong connection exists with HF with reduced ejection fraction, since ischemic aetiology is common in both categories, conveying relevant implications for prognosis and therapeutic response. Little is known about its pathophysiology: mild systolic impairment may be not enough and advocating diastolic dysfunction may be an oversimplification. An increasing amount of data is clarifying how many of HFmrEF patients are the results of deteriorating or recovering hearts, thus underscoring that aetiology may be, more than EF, the key to understand this new category. Sparse evidence points toward a potential benefit of common HF therapies in those patients, but further research is still needed. © Copyright R. Martone et al., 2019.
2019
89
63
66
Goal 3: Good health and well-being for people
Martone R.; Marchionni N.; Cappelli F.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Martone R - Monaldi Archives for Chest Diesease 2019.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Pdf editoriale (Version of record)
Licenza: Open Access
Dimensione 355.66 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
355.66 kB Adobe PDF

I documenti in FLORE sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificatore per citare o creare un link a questa risorsa: https://hdl.handle.net/2158/1177961
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 8
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 7
social impact