Atrial fibrillation is more frequent in older patients, who have a higher risk of cardioembolic stroke and thromboembolism. Oral anticoagulant therapy is the standard of treatment for stroke prevention; however, under-prescription is still very common in older patients. The reasons underlying this phenomenon have not been systematically investigated, and true contraindications only partially account for it. An intimate skepticism on the real benefit-risk balance of oral anticoagulant therapy in the oldest patients seems to derive from the fact that most studies supporting it were conducted decades ago and included younger patients, with overall better functional and clinical status. In this review we will focus on the main barriers to anticoagulant therapy prescription in older patients and summarize the available evidences on the efficacy and safety of vitamin K antagonists and direct oral anticoagulants in this population. The encouraging evidence of a higher net clinical benefit of direct oral anticoagulants compared with warfarin should hopefully widen the treatment options also for frail individuals, thereby allowing a greater number of patients to be treated according to current international guidelines. © 2017 European Federation of Internal Medicine

Oral anticoagulant therapy for older patients with atrial fibrillation: a review of current evidence / Bo M.; Grisoglio E.; Brunetti E.; Falcone Y.; Marchionni N.. - In: EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE. - ISSN 0953-6205. - ELETTRONICO. - 41:(2017), pp. 18-27. [10.1016/j.ejim.2017.03.012]

Oral anticoagulant therapy for older patients with atrial fibrillation: a review of current evidence

Marchionni N.
2017

Abstract

Atrial fibrillation is more frequent in older patients, who have a higher risk of cardioembolic stroke and thromboembolism. Oral anticoagulant therapy is the standard of treatment for stroke prevention; however, under-prescription is still very common in older patients. The reasons underlying this phenomenon have not been systematically investigated, and true contraindications only partially account for it. An intimate skepticism on the real benefit-risk balance of oral anticoagulant therapy in the oldest patients seems to derive from the fact that most studies supporting it were conducted decades ago and included younger patients, with overall better functional and clinical status. In this review we will focus on the main barriers to anticoagulant therapy prescription in older patients and summarize the available evidences on the efficacy and safety of vitamin K antagonists and direct oral anticoagulants in this population. The encouraging evidence of a higher net clinical benefit of direct oral anticoagulants compared with warfarin should hopefully widen the treatment options also for frail individuals, thereby allowing a greater number of patients to be treated according to current international guidelines. © 2017 European Federation of Internal Medicine
2017
41
18
27
Bo M.; Grisoglio E.; Brunetti E.; Falcone Y.; Marchionni N.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Bo M European J of Intern Medicine 2017.pdf

Accesso chiuso

Tipologia: Pdf editoriale (Version of record)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati
Dimensione 649.23 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
649.23 kB Adobe PDF   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in FLORE sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificatore per citare o creare un link a questa risorsa: https://hdl.handle.net/2158/1177978
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 27
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 24
social impact