Despite the mounting threats that tropical ecosystems face, conservation in the tropics remains severely under-researched relative to temperate systems. Efforts to address this knowledge gap have so far largely failed to analyze the relationship between an author's choice of study site and that author's country of origin. We examined factors that motivate both foreign and domestic scientists to conduct research in tropical countries, based on a sample of nearly 3000 tropical conservation research articles. Many barriers that have historically deterred foreign research effort appear to have been overcome, although US scientists still respond negatively to safety concerns and distance. The productivity of local scientists is affected by corruption and lack of institutional support. Both foreign and in-country scientists are increasingly working in places with more listed threatened species, but many regions still lack adequate conservation research. Although foreign scientists could be attracted to less-studied areas through targeted grants, the long-term solution must be to train and employ more local scientists.

Who studies where? Boosting tropical conservation research where it is most needed / Reboredo Segovia A.L.; Romano D.; Armsworth P.R.. - In: FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT. - ISSN 1540-9295. - STAMPA. - (2020), pp. 1-8. [10.1002/fee.2146]

Who studies where? Boosting tropical conservation research where it is most needed

Romano D.;
2020

Abstract

Despite the mounting threats that tropical ecosystems face, conservation in the tropics remains severely under-researched relative to temperate systems. Efforts to address this knowledge gap have so far largely failed to analyze the relationship between an author's choice of study site and that author's country of origin. We examined factors that motivate both foreign and domestic scientists to conduct research in tropical countries, based on a sample of nearly 3000 tropical conservation research articles. Many barriers that have historically deterred foreign research effort appear to have been overcome, although US scientists still respond negatively to safety concerns and distance. The productivity of local scientists is affected by corruption and lack of institutional support. Both foreign and in-country scientists are increasingly working in places with more listed threatened species, but many regions still lack adequate conservation research. Although foreign scientists could be attracted to less-studied areas through targeted grants, the long-term solution must be to train and employ more local scientists.
2020
1
8
Goal 4: Quality education
Goal 13: Climate action
Goal 14: Life below water
Goal 15: Life on land
Reboredo Segovia A.L.; Romano D.; Armsworth P.R.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Segovia_et_al-2020-Frontiers_in_Ecology_and_the_Environment.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Pdf editoriale (Version of record)
Licenza: Open Access
Dimensione 1.94 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.94 MB Adobe PDF

I documenti in FLORE sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificatore per citare o creare un link a questa risorsa: https://hdl.handle.net/2158/1185963
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 23
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 22
social impact