The growing demand among stakeholders for credible sustainability information has spurred research in the field of sustainability report assurance practices. In this study, four different theories—stakeholder theory, institutional theory, signaling theory and legitimacy theory—are used to formulate several hypotheses regarding the main factors that can influence a company’s decision to assure its sustainability reports. Using a sample of 417 listed organizations based in different European countries over five years, the effects of stakeholder commitment, country orientation toward sustainability, firm environmental performance and business ethics controversies on the decision to assure SRs are assessed. The results show that a company’s decision to assure its sustainability reports is motivated by the need to maintain good relations with its stakeholders (which is in line with stakeholder theory and legitimacy theory) as well as by the willingness to signal their sustainability performance (which is in line with signaling theory) and to gain legitimacy. On the contrary, business ethics controversies do not seem to be relevant to a company’s assurance practices. This research provides new insights into the influence that social, environmental and institutional factors have on assurance strategies. New factors that previous research does not investigate—environmental performance, business ethics controversies and corporate governance—are tested. Factors that are already investigated in the literature are considered from an original perspective of introducing alternative measures (e.g. for the scope of national sustainability policies).

Effects of Social, Environmental, and Institutional Factors on Sustainability Report Assurance: Evidence from European Countries / Lorenzo Simoni, Laura Bini, Marco Bellucci. - In: MEDITARI ACCOUNTANCY RESEARCH. - ISSN 2049-372X. - STAMPA. - 28:(2020), pp. 1059-1087. [10.1108/MEDAR-03-2019-0462]

Effects of Social, Environmental, and Institutional Factors on Sustainability Report Assurance: Evidence from European Countries

Lorenzo Simoni;Laura Bini
;
Marco Bellucci
2020

Abstract

The growing demand among stakeholders for credible sustainability information has spurred research in the field of sustainability report assurance practices. In this study, four different theories—stakeholder theory, institutional theory, signaling theory and legitimacy theory—are used to formulate several hypotheses regarding the main factors that can influence a company’s decision to assure its sustainability reports. Using a sample of 417 listed organizations based in different European countries over five years, the effects of stakeholder commitment, country orientation toward sustainability, firm environmental performance and business ethics controversies on the decision to assure SRs are assessed. The results show that a company’s decision to assure its sustainability reports is motivated by the need to maintain good relations with its stakeholders (which is in line with stakeholder theory and legitimacy theory) as well as by the willingness to signal their sustainability performance (which is in line with signaling theory) and to gain legitimacy. On the contrary, business ethics controversies do not seem to be relevant to a company’s assurance practices. This research provides new insights into the influence that social, environmental and institutional factors have on assurance strategies. New factors that previous research does not investigate—environmental performance, business ethics controversies and corporate governance—are tested. Factors that are already investigated in the literature are considered from an original perspective of introducing alternative measures (e.g. for the scope of national sustainability policies).
2020
28
1059
1087
Goal 8: Decent work and economic growth
Goal 11: Sustainable cities and communities
Goal 12: Responsible consumption and production
Goal 13: Climate action
Lorenzo Simoni, Laura Bini, Marco Bellucci
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Sustainability reporting assurance MEDAR.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: Full paper
Tipologia: Pdf editoriale (Version of record)
Licenza: Open Access
Dimensione 304.28 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
304.28 kB Adobe PDF

I documenti in FLORE sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificatore per citare o creare un link a questa risorsa: https://hdl.handle.net/2158/1189123
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 69
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 61
social impact