It was suggested that the lack of haptic feedback, formerly considered a limitation for the da Vinci robotic system, does not affect robotic surgeons because of training and compensation based on visual feedback. However, conclusive studies are still missing, and the interest in force reflection is rising again. Methods We integrated a seven‐DoF master into the da Vinci Research Kit. We designed tissue grasping, palpation, and incision tasks with robotic surgeons, to be performed by three groups of users (expert surgeons, medical residents, and nonsurgeons, five users/group), either with or without haptic feedback. Task‐specific quantitative metrics and a questionnaire were used for assessment. Results Force reflection made a statistically significant difference for both palpation (improved inclusion detection rate) and incision (decreased tissue damage). Conclusions Haptic feedback can improve key surgical outcomes for tasks requiring a pronounced cognitive burden for the surgeon, to be possibly negotiated with longer completion times.

Haptic feedback in the da Vinci Research Kit (dVRK): A user study based on grasping, palpation, and incision tasks / Saracino A, Deguet A, Staderini F, Boushaki MN, Cianchi F, Menciassi A, Sinibaldi E. - In: THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ROBOTICS AND COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY. - ISSN 1478-596X. - STAMPA. - (2019), pp. 0-0. [10.1002/rcs.1999]

Haptic feedback in the da Vinci Research Kit (dVRK): A user study based on grasping, palpation, and incision tasks.

Staderini F;Cianchi F;
2019

Abstract

It was suggested that the lack of haptic feedback, formerly considered a limitation for the da Vinci robotic system, does not affect robotic surgeons because of training and compensation based on visual feedback. However, conclusive studies are still missing, and the interest in force reflection is rising again. Methods We integrated a seven‐DoF master into the da Vinci Research Kit. We designed tissue grasping, palpation, and incision tasks with robotic surgeons, to be performed by three groups of users (expert surgeons, medical residents, and nonsurgeons, five users/group), either with or without haptic feedback. Task‐specific quantitative metrics and a questionnaire were used for assessment. Results Force reflection made a statistically significant difference for both palpation (improved inclusion detection rate) and incision (decreased tissue damage). Conclusions Haptic feedback can improve key surgical outcomes for tasks requiring a pronounced cognitive burden for the surgeon, to be possibly negotiated with longer completion times.
2019
0
0
Goal 3: Good health and well-being for people
Saracino A, Deguet A, Staderini F, Boushaki MN, Cianchi F, Menciassi A, Sinibaldi E
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
haptic feedback ....pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Pdf editoriale (Version of record)
Licenza: Open Access
Dimensione 2.79 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.79 MB Adobe PDF

I documenti in FLORE sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificatore per citare o creare un link a questa risorsa: https://hdl.handle.net/2158/1194583
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 33
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 32
social impact