Precision agriculture (PA) provides techniques that favour the localized application of inputs allowing their rational use. This makes the PA a potential indicator of reduced operational costs, input volume, and environmental impacts. The objective of this study was to evaluate and compare the environmental effects of three different sampling methods used in PA for the lime application. The first sampling method evaluated was the grid sampling (GS). It was performed at a density of one sample per hectare in a 100×100 m georeferenced grid. The second method was the directed sampling, that was performed after defining the management zones by soil apparent electrical conductivity (ECa) using a soil electrical conductivity sensor. The lest sampling method was the Altitude-based management zone (AMZ) sampling that was developed based on altitude maps of the field. These sampling methods were tested in three different areas in the south of Brazil. This study evaluated the spatial variability of the lime volume in the soil and compared quantitatively and spatially the recommended application volumes achieved by each sampling method. Results highlighted that the sensor-directed soil sampling method was the alternative that would generate the lowest environmental impact.

Comparative environmental analysis of soil sampling methods in precision agriculture for lime application in Paraná State, Brazil / Daniele Sarri; Marco vieri. - ELETTRONICO. - (2020), pp. 100-109. (Intervento presentato al convegno 11TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE on Biosystems Engineering 2020 tenutosi a Estonian University of Life Sciences, Fr. R. Kreutzwaldi 56, Tartu, Estonia) [10.15159/ar.20.101].

Comparative environmental analysis of soil sampling methods in precision agriculture for lime application in Paraná State, Brazil

Daniele Sarri
Writing – Original Draft Preparation
;
Marco vieri
Writing – Original Draft Preparation
2020

Abstract

Precision agriculture (PA) provides techniques that favour the localized application of inputs allowing their rational use. This makes the PA a potential indicator of reduced operational costs, input volume, and environmental impacts. The objective of this study was to evaluate and compare the environmental effects of three different sampling methods used in PA for the lime application. The first sampling method evaluated was the grid sampling (GS). It was performed at a density of one sample per hectare in a 100×100 m georeferenced grid. The second method was the directed sampling, that was performed after defining the management zones by soil apparent electrical conductivity (ECa) using a soil electrical conductivity sensor. The lest sampling method was the Altitude-based management zone (AMZ) sampling that was developed based on altitude maps of the field. These sampling methods were tested in three different areas in the south of Brazil. This study evaluated the spatial variability of the lime volume in the soil and compared quantitatively and spatially the recommended application volumes achieved by each sampling method. Results highlighted that the sensor-directed soil sampling method was the alternative that would generate the lowest environmental impact.
2020
11TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE on Biosystems Engineering
11TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE on Biosystems Engineering 2020
Estonian University of Life Sciences, Fr. R. Kreutzwaldi 56, Tartu, Estonia
Daniele Sarri; Marco vieri
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
AR2020_147_Gonçalves_V_doi_101.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Pdf editoriale (Version of record)
Licenza: Open Access
Dimensione 966.76 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
966.76 kB Adobe PDF

I documenti in FLORE sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificatore per citare o creare un link a questa risorsa: https://hdl.handle.net/2158/1195011
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact