Objectives/Hypothesis: The need for class I and II studies on the efficacy of liberatory maneuvers in the treatment of lateral canal benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (LC-BPPV) motivated the present double-blind randomized trial on the short-term efficacy of the forced prolonged position (FPP). Study Design: Double-blind, randomized controlled trial. Methods: Two hundred twenty-one patients with unilateral LC-BPPV met the inclusion criteria for a multicentric study. Patients were randomly assigned to treatment by FPP (116 subjects) or sham treatment (105 subjects). Subjects were followed up at 24 hours with the supine roll test by blinded examiners. Results: Among the sample, 67.4% and 32.6% of the patients showed respectively geotropic and apogeotropic variant of LC-BPPV. At the 24-hour follow-up, the effectiveness of FFP compared to the sham maneuver was, respectively, 57.8% versus 12.4% (P <.0001) in the total sample, 76.9% versus 11.3% (P <.0001) in the geotropic variant group, and 60.5% versus 17.6% (P =.0003) in the apogeotropic variant group, including resolution or transformation to geotropic variant. Conclusions: FPP proved highly effective compared to the sham maneuver. The present class 2 study of the efficacy of the FPP changes the level of recommendation of the method for treating LC-BPPV into a strong one. Level of Evidence: 2 Laryngoscope, 2020.

Double-Blind Randomized Trial on the Efficacy of the Forced Prolonged Position for Treatment of Lateral Canal Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo / Mandala M.; Califano L.; Casani A.P.; Faralli M.; Marcelli V.; Neri G.; Pecci R.; Scasso F.; Scotto di Santillo L.; Vannucchi P.; Giannoni B.; Dasgupta S.; Bindi I.; Salerni L.; Nuti D.. - In: LARYNGOSCOPE. - ISSN 0023-852X. - ELETTRONICO. - (2020), pp. 1-5. [10.1002/lary.28981]

Double-Blind Randomized Trial on the Efficacy of the Forced Prolonged Position for Treatment of Lateral Canal Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo

Pecci R.;Giannoni B.;
2020

Abstract

Objectives/Hypothesis: The need for class I and II studies on the efficacy of liberatory maneuvers in the treatment of lateral canal benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (LC-BPPV) motivated the present double-blind randomized trial on the short-term efficacy of the forced prolonged position (FPP). Study Design: Double-blind, randomized controlled trial. Methods: Two hundred twenty-one patients with unilateral LC-BPPV met the inclusion criteria for a multicentric study. Patients were randomly assigned to treatment by FPP (116 subjects) or sham treatment (105 subjects). Subjects were followed up at 24 hours with the supine roll test by blinded examiners. Results: Among the sample, 67.4% and 32.6% of the patients showed respectively geotropic and apogeotropic variant of LC-BPPV. At the 24-hour follow-up, the effectiveness of FFP compared to the sham maneuver was, respectively, 57.8% versus 12.4% (P <.0001) in the total sample, 76.9% versus 11.3% (P <.0001) in the geotropic variant group, and 60.5% versus 17.6% (P =.0003) in the apogeotropic variant group, including resolution or transformation to geotropic variant. Conclusions: FPP proved highly effective compared to the sham maneuver. The present class 2 study of the efficacy of the FPP changes the level of recommendation of the method for treating LC-BPPV into a strong one. Level of Evidence: 2 Laryngoscope, 2020.
2020
1
5
Goal 3: Good health and well-being for people
Mandala M.; Califano L.; Casani A.P.; Faralli M.; Marcelli V.; Neri G.; Pecci R.; Scasso F.; Scotto di Santillo L.; Vannucchi P.; Giannoni B.; Dasgupta S.; Bindi I.; Salerni L.; Nuti D.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
FPP for LSC-BPPV.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Pdf editoriale (Version of record)
Licenza: Open Access
Dimensione 227.47 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
227.47 kB Adobe PDF

I documenti in FLORE sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificatore per citare o creare un link a questa risorsa: https://hdl.handle.net/2158/1205900
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 12
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 10
social impact