This paper was written with the aim of highlighting the functional and structural correlations between gesticulation and prosody, focusing on gesture / prosody synchronization in spontaneous spoken Italian. The gesture annotation follows the LASG model (Bressem et al., 2013), while the prosodic annotation relies on the identification of terminal and non-terminal prosodic breaks which, according to L-AcT (Cresti, 2000; Moneglia and Raso, 2014), determine speech act boundaries and the information structure, respectively. Gesticulation co-occurs with speech in about 90% of the speech flow examined and gestural arcs are synchronous with prosodic boundaries. Gesture Phrases, which contain the expressive phase (Stroke) never cross terminal prosodic boundaries, finding in the Utterance the maximum unit for gesture / speech correlation. Strokes may correlate with all information unit types, however is infrequent with Dialogic Units (i.e. those functional to the management of the communication). The identification of linguistic units via the marking of prosodic boundaries allows us to understand the linguistic scope of the gesture, supporting its interpretation. Gestures may be linked to information belonging to different linguistic levels, namely: a) the word level; b) the information unit phrase; c) the information unit function; d) the illocutionary value.

THE ANNOTATION OF GESTURE AND GESTURE / PROSODY SYNCHRONIZATION IN MULTIMODAL SPEECH CORPORA / Giorgina Cantalini, Massimo Moneglia. - In: JOURNAL OF SPEECH SCIENCES. - ISSN 2236-9740. - ELETTRONICO. - (2020), pp. 1-24.

THE ANNOTATION OF GESTURE AND GESTURE / PROSODY SYNCHRONIZATION IN MULTIMODAL SPEECH CORPORA

Massimo Moneglia
2020

Abstract

This paper was written with the aim of highlighting the functional and structural correlations between gesticulation and prosody, focusing on gesture / prosody synchronization in spontaneous spoken Italian. The gesture annotation follows the LASG model (Bressem et al., 2013), while the prosodic annotation relies on the identification of terminal and non-terminal prosodic breaks which, according to L-AcT (Cresti, 2000; Moneglia and Raso, 2014), determine speech act boundaries and the information structure, respectively. Gesticulation co-occurs with speech in about 90% of the speech flow examined and gestural arcs are synchronous with prosodic boundaries. Gesture Phrases, which contain the expressive phase (Stroke) never cross terminal prosodic boundaries, finding in the Utterance the maximum unit for gesture / speech correlation. Strokes may correlate with all information unit types, however is infrequent with Dialogic Units (i.e. those functional to the management of the communication). The identification of linguistic units via the marking of prosodic boundaries allows us to understand the linguistic scope of the gesture, supporting its interpretation. Gestures may be linked to information belonging to different linguistic levels, namely: a) the word level; b) the information unit phrase; c) the information unit function; d) the illocutionary value.
2020
1
24
Goal 3: Good health and well-being for people
Giorgina Cantalini, Massimo Moneglia
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
193-1167-1-PB (1).pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: Articolo
Tipologia: Pdf editoriale (Version of record)
Licenza: Open Access
Dimensione 1.48 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.48 MB Adobe PDF

I documenti in FLORE sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificatore per citare o creare un link a questa risorsa: https://hdl.handle.net/2158/1206430
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact