Objective: Ultrasounds (US) use in neural engineering is so far mainly limited to ablation through high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU), but interesting preliminary results show that low frequency low intensity ultrasound (LILFU) could be instead used to modulate neural activity. However, the extent of this modulatory ability of US is still unclear, as in in vivo studies it is hard to disentangle the contribution to neural responses of direct activation of the neuron by US stimulation and indirect activation due either to sensory response to mechanical stimulation associated to US, or to propagation of activity from neighboring areas. Here, we aim at showing how to separate the three effects and assess the presence of direct response to US stimulation in zebrafish. Approach: We observed in zebrafish larvae brain-wide US-induced activity patterns through calcium imaging microscopy. Sensory response to mechanical stimulation was assessed with a US shield. Activity propagation was assessed with inter-area latency evaluation. Main results: We prove that in selected brain regions zebrafish neural response is mainly due to direct activation, later spreading to the other regions. Shielding the neurons from direct US stimulation resulted in a significantly attenuated response, showing that sensory stimulation does not play a prominent role. Significance: US non-invasive neuromodulatory approach might lead to novel ways to test and control neural activity, and hence to novel neuromodulatory therapies. Future studies will focus on the biophysical structure of directly responsive neurons to capture the mechanisms of US induced activity.

Direct activation of zebrafish neurons by ultrasonic stimulation revealed by whole CNS calcium imaging / Nicolo Meneghetti; Francesca Dedola; Vladislav Gavryusev; Giuseppe Sancataldo; Lapo Turrini; Giuseppe de Vito; Natascia Tiso; Francesco Vanzi; Jacopo Carpaneto; Annarita Cutrone; Francesco S. Pavone; Silvestro Micera; Alberto Mazzoni. - In: JOURNAL OF NEURAL ENGINEERING. - ISSN 1741-2560. - ELETTRONICO. - 17:(2020), pp. 0-0. [10.1088/1741-2552/abae8b]

Direct activation of zebrafish neurons by ultrasonic stimulation revealed by whole CNS calcium imaging

Vladislav Gavryusev;Giuseppe Sancataldo;Lapo Turrini;Giuseppe de Vito;Francesco Vanzi;Francesco S. Pavone;
2020

Abstract

Objective: Ultrasounds (US) use in neural engineering is so far mainly limited to ablation through high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU), but interesting preliminary results show that low frequency low intensity ultrasound (LILFU) could be instead used to modulate neural activity. However, the extent of this modulatory ability of US is still unclear, as in in vivo studies it is hard to disentangle the contribution to neural responses of direct activation of the neuron by US stimulation and indirect activation due either to sensory response to mechanical stimulation associated to US, or to propagation of activity from neighboring areas. Here, we aim at showing how to separate the three effects and assess the presence of direct response to US stimulation in zebrafish. Approach: We observed in zebrafish larvae brain-wide US-induced activity patterns through calcium imaging microscopy. Sensory response to mechanical stimulation was assessed with a US shield. Activity propagation was assessed with inter-area latency evaluation. Main results: We prove that in selected brain regions zebrafish neural response is mainly due to direct activation, later spreading to the other regions. Shielding the neurons from direct US stimulation resulted in a significantly attenuated response, showing that sensory stimulation does not play a prominent role. Significance: US non-invasive neuromodulatory approach might lead to novel ways to test and control neural activity, and hence to novel neuromodulatory therapies. Future studies will focus on the biophysical structure of directly responsive neurons to capture the mechanisms of US induced activity.
2020
17
0
0
Goal 3: Good health and well-being for people
Nicolo Meneghetti; Francesca Dedola; Vladislav Gavryusev; Giuseppe Sancataldo; Lapo Turrini; Giuseppe de Vito; Natascia Tiso; Francesco Vanzi; Jacopo Carpaneto; Annarita Cutrone; Francesco S. Pavone; Silvestro Micera; Alberto Mazzoni
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Meneghetti_2020_J._Neural_Eng._17_056033.pdf

Accesso chiuso

Tipologia: Pdf editoriale (Version of record)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati
Dimensione 2.29 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.29 MB Adobe PDF   Richiedi una copia
Meneghetti-2020.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: accepted manuscript
Tipologia: Versione finale referata (Postprint, Accepted manuscript)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 1.69 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.69 MB Adobe PDF

I documenti in FLORE sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificatore per citare o creare un link a questa risorsa: https://hdl.handle.net/2158/1207263
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 3
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 3
social impact