We thank Dr Li and colleagues for their interest in our investigation and for raising questions that are supported by the current literature on this topic. We hope our response can contribute to a better understanding of the study's findings. This was a retrospective study based on the analysis of a sample of orthodontic records of patients from a graduate program in orthodontics. Unfortunately, anthropometric data were not available in the patients' files. Therefore, the body mass index could not be retrieved; this would have been important information to present. However, considering that this is a population of patients in which overweight is rarely found because of its ethnic and socioeconomic backgrounds, we can assume that most patients might be within the normal range of body mass index. Apart from the volumetric increase of the oropharynx after mandibular advancement with the Herbst appliance, the minimum cross-sectional area and the sagittal and transversal 2-dimensional measurements of the axial slice of the minimum cross-sectional area of the oropharynx also presented significant increases (P.001). However, the height of the oropharynx did not present linear changes during the observation period in either the Herbst appliance group or the comparison group. Measurements were performed by the same investigator, using Dolphin Imaging Software (Dolphin Imaging&Management Solutions, Chatsworth, Calif), according to the method described elsewhere,1 within the anatomic boundaries of the oropharynx described in this article. We have provided a Table with the 2-dimensional changes of the oropharynx, between T0 and T1 of both groups.
Lettera all'Editore - Authors' response / Oliveira P.M.; Cheib-Vilefort P.L.; de Parsia Gontijo H.; Souki B.Q.; Melgaco C.A.; Franchi L.; McNamara J.A.. - In: AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS. - ISSN 0889-5406. - STAMPA. - 158:(2020), pp. 6-7. [10.1016/j.ajodo.2020.03.012]
Lettera all'Editore - Authors' response
Franchi L.;
2020
Abstract
We thank Dr Li and colleagues for their interest in our investigation and for raising questions that are supported by the current literature on this topic. We hope our response can contribute to a better understanding of the study's findings. This was a retrospective study based on the analysis of a sample of orthodontic records of patients from a graduate program in orthodontics. Unfortunately, anthropometric data were not available in the patients' files. Therefore, the body mass index could not be retrieved; this would have been important information to present. However, considering that this is a population of patients in which overweight is rarely found because of its ethnic and socioeconomic backgrounds, we can assume that most patients might be within the normal range of body mass index. Apart from the volumetric increase of the oropharynx after mandibular advancement with the Herbst appliance, the minimum cross-sectional area and the sagittal and transversal 2-dimensional measurements of the axial slice of the minimum cross-sectional area of the oropharynx also presented significant increases (P.001). However, the height of the oropharynx did not present linear changes during the observation period in either the Herbst appliance group or the comparison group. Measurements were performed by the same investigator, using Dolphin Imaging Software (Dolphin Imaging&Management Solutions, Chatsworth, Calif), according to the method described elsewhere,1 within the anatomic boundaries of the oropharynx described in this article. We have provided a Table with the 2-dimensional changes of the oropharynx, between T0 and T1 of both groups.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
1-s2.0-S0889540620301918-main.pdf
Accesso chiuso
Tipologia:
Pdf editoriale (Version of record)
Licenza:
Tutti i diritti riservati
Dimensione
52.19 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
52.19 kB | Adobe PDF | Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in FLORE sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.



