Aims: Left main stenting is increasingly performed and often involves deployment of a single stent across vessels with marked disparity in diameters.Knowing stent expansion capacity is critical to ensure adequate strut apposition after post-dilatation of the stent has been performed. Coronary stentsare usually manufactured in only two or three different model designs with each design having a different maximal expansion capacity. Information aboutthe different workhorse designs and their maximal achievable diameter is not commonly provided by manufacturers but, in the absence of this criticallyimportant information, stents implanted in segments with major changes in vessel diameter have the potential to become grossly overstretched and toremain incompletely apposed.Methods and results: We examined the differences in workhorse designs of six commercially available drug-eluting stents (DES): the PROMUS Element,Taxus Liberté, XIENCE Prime, Resolute Integrity, BioMatrix Flex and Cypher Select stents. Using micro-computed tomography, we tested oversizingcapabilities above nominal pressures for the different workhorse designs of the six DES using 4.0, 5.0 and 6.0 mm post-dilatation balloons inflated to 14atmospheres. MLD could be increased significantly in all stents, only restricted by workhorse design limitations. Minimal inner lumen diameter (MLD)achieved after two successive 6.0 mm post-dilatations of the largest design (4.0 mm stent) was 5.7 mm for the Element, 5.6 mm for the XIENCE Prime,6.0 mm for the Taxus, 5.4 mm for the Resolute Integrity, 5.9 mm for the BioMatrix and 5.8 mm for the Cypher stent. Significant deformations wereobserved during stent oversizing with large changes in terms of cell opening and crowns expansion. These are affected by design structure and revealimportant differences among all stents tested. Such extensive deformations may alter the functional ability of an individual stent to scaffold a lesion andprevent restenosis.Conclusions: Stent selection based on stent model design may be critical, particularly for treatment of large artery and left main bifurcations whereoverexpansion is normally required to optimise results and ensure full expansion of the stent.

Maximal expansion capacity with current des platforms: A critical factor for stent selection in the treatment of left main bifurcations? / Foin N.; Sen S.; Allegria E.; Petraco R.; Nijjer S.; Francis D.P.; Di Mario C.; Davies J.E.. - In: EUROINTERVENTION. - ISSN 1774-024X. - ELETTRONICO. - 8:(2013), pp. 1315-1325. [10.4244/EIJV8I11A200]

Maximal expansion capacity with current des platforms: A critical factor for stent selection in the treatment of left main bifurcations?

Di Mario C.;
2013

Abstract

Aims: Left main stenting is increasingly performed and often involves deployment of a single stent across vessels with marked disparity in diameters.Knowing stent expansion capacity is critical to ensure adequate strut apposition after post-dilatation of the stent has been performed. Coronary stentsare usually manufactured in only two or three different model designs with each design having a different maximal expansion capacity. Information aboutthe different workhorse designs and their maximal achievable diameter is not commonly provided by manufacturers but, in the absence of this criticallyimportant information, stents implanted in segments with major changes in vessel diameter have the potential to become grossly overstretched and toremain incompletely apposed.Methods and results: We examined the differences in workhorse designs of six commercially available drug-eluting stents (DES): the PROMUS Element,Taxus Liberté, XIENCE Prime, Resolute Integrity, BioMatrix Flex and Cypher Select stents. Using micro-computed tomography, we tested oversizingcapabilities above nominal pressures for the different workhorse designs of the six DES using 4.0, 5.0 and 6.0 mm post-dilatation balloons inflated to 14atmospheres. MLD could be increased significantly in all stents, only restricted by workhorse design limitations. Minimal inner lumen diameter (MLD)achieved after two successive 6.0 mm post-dilatations of the largest design (4.0 mm stent) was 5.7 mm for the Element, 5.6 mm for the XIENCE Prime,6.0 mm for the Taxus, 5.4 mm for the Resolute Integrity, 5.9 mm for the BioMatrix and 5.8 mm for the Cypher stent. Significant deformations wereobserved during stent oversizing with large changes in terms of cell opening and crowns expansion. These are affected by design structure and revealimportant differences among all stents tested. Such extensive deformations may alter the functional ability of an individual stent to scaffold a lesion andprevent restenosis.Conclusions: Stent selection based on stent model design may be critical, particularly for treatment of large artery and left main bifurcations whereoverexpansion is normally required to optimise results and ensure full expansion of the stent.
2013
8
1315
1325
Goal 3: Good health and well-being for people
Foin N.; Sen S.; Allegria E.; Petraco R.; Nijjer S.; Francis D.P.; Di Mario C.; Davies J.E.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in FLORE sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificatore per citare o creare un link a questa risorsa: https://hdl.handle.net/2158/1216532
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 92
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 73
social impact