Ἀληθείῃ καὶ πνεύματι (Par. 4.114): Some Doctrinal Issues in Nonnus’ Paraphrase and Their Theological Implications

Looking at the whole of Nonnus’ interpretation about the Spirit, we can say that the poet embraces this task completely, trying to explain the basis of the dynamic relation between Father and Son through the Spirit. Choosing to adopt a metaphorical language, consisting mainly in the adoption of fire and water as symbolic elements and rich with deep doctrinal implications, the Holy Spirit has been intended as a source of revelation and wisdom or as an empowerment for more effective activity by God. This aspect is made clear by Nonnus’ Paraphrase when he depicts him as a medium and a gift given to believers to allow them to come to a better understanding of God, as well as to assure them of the presence of the Father and of the Son. However, in some contexts, the use of πνεῦμα suggests not a reference to the Spirit per se, but a reference to the impartation of God’s nature as πνεῦμα. In Nonnus, the concept of πνεῦμα is intertwined strictly with the Father and proceeds from him. The emphasis is on the nature and work of the Spirit and on its characterization as the third Person of the Trinity.