Nowadays, Machine Learning (ML) algorithms are being incorporated into many systems since they can learn and solve complex problems. Some of these systems can be considered as Safety-Critical Systems (SCS), therefore, the performance of ML algorithms should be sufficiently safe concerning the safety requirements of the incorporating SCS. However, the performance analysis of ML algorithms, usually, relies on metrics that were not developed with safety in mind. Accordingly, they may not be appropriate for assessing the performance of ML algorithms concerning safety. This paper debates on accounting for the distribution - not just the amount - of False Negatives as an additional element to be used when assessing ML algorithms to be integrated into SCS. We empirically try to assess the properness of incorporating ML-based components (anomaly-based intrusion detectors) into SCS using both traditional and novel SSPr and NPr metrics that focus on the numbers as well as the distribution of False Negatives. Results obtained by our experiment allow discussing the potential of ML-based components to be incorporated into SCS.
Understanding the properness of incorporating machine learning algorithms in safety-critical systems / Gharib M.; Zoppi T.; Bondavalli A.. - ELETTRONICO. - (2021), pp. 232-234. (Intervento presentato al convegno 36th Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, SAC 2021 tenutosi a online nel 2021) [10.1145/3412841.3442074].
Understanding the properness of incorporating machine learning algorithms in safety-critical systems
Gharib M.;Zoppi T.;Bondavalli A.
2021
Abstract
Nowadays, Machine Learning (ML) algorithms are being incorporated into many systems since they can learn and solve complex problems. Some of these systems can be considered as Safety-Critical Systems (SCS), therefore, the performance of ML algorithms should be sufficiently safe concerning the safety requirements of the incorporating SCS. However, the performance analysis of ML algorithms, usually, relies on metrics that were not developed with safety in mind. Accordingly, they may not be appropriate for assessing the performance of ML algorithms concerning safety. This paper debates on accounting for the distribution - not just the amount - of False Negatives as an additional element to be used when assessing ML algorithms to be integrated into SCS. We empirically try to assess the properness of incorporating ML-based components (anomaly-based intrusion detectors) into SCS using both traditional and novel SSPr and NPr metrics that focus on the numbers as well as the distribution of False Negatives. Results obtained by our experiment allow discussing the potential of ML-based components to be incorporated into SCS.I documenti in FLORE sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.