Literature on research in dynamic geometry environments (DGEs) addresses the importance of the perception of invariants in open problem investigations. In this paper, in order to analyse students’ processes during exploration, conjecturing, and proving in DGEs, we introduce a framework that distinguishes different types of invariants. Students’ interpretation of these invariants seems to be strongly rooted in the processes of their discovery more than in the generality of theorems and proofs.

Different perceptions of invariants and generality of proof in dynamic geometry / Baccaglini-Frank A.; Mariotti M.A.; Antonini S.. - In: PROCEEDINGS OF THE PME CONFERENCE. - ISSN 0771-100X. - STAMPA. - 2:(2009), pp. 89-96. (Intervento presentato al convegno 33rd Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education tenutosi a Thessaloniki, Greece nel 19-24 July, 2009).

Different perceptions of invariants and generality of proof in dynamic geometry

Antonini S.
2009

Abstract

Literature on research in dynamic geometry environments (DGEs) addresses the importance of the perception of invariants in open problem investigations. In this paper, in order to analyse students’ processes during exploration, conjecturing, and proving in DGEs, we introduce a framework that distinguishes different types of invariants. Students’ interpretation of these invariants seems to be strongly rooted in the processes of their discovery more than in the generality of theorems and proofs.
2009
Proceedings of the 33rd conference of the International group for the psychology of mathematics education
33rd Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education
Thessaloniki, Greece
19-24 July, 2009
Baccaglini-Frank A.; Mariotti M.A.; Antonini S.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in FLORE sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificatore per citare o creare un link a questa risorsa: https://hdl.handle.net/2158/1244518
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 7
social impact